In order to understand what is really going on around the globe in terms of the collapsing economy, we must set aside false mainstream versions of reality. When it comes to the EU and its current fiscal turmoil, it is very important to, in some respects, ignore Greece entirely. That’s right; forget about all the supposed drama surrounding Greek debt obligations. Will they find a way to pay creditors? Will they default? Will they make a deal with Russia and the BRICS? Will there be last-minute concessions to save the system? It doesn’t matter. It’s all a soap opera, an elaborate Kabuki theater run by international financiers and globalists.
It is most important to remember the fundamentals. Greece will default on its debts. Period. There is no way around it. Maybe Greece makes a deal today, maybe it makes a deal tomorrow; but eventually, the country’s ability to stretch out its resources in order to meet its exponential liabilities will end. It is inevitable, and no last-minute “deal” is going to change the math at the core of it all.
Why are so many economists so worried about a little country like Greece? It's all due to a great lie: a dishonest narrative being perpetuated by the establishment that if Greece falls, defaults or leaves the EU, this could trigger a domino effect of other nations hitting a debt wall and following suit. The lie embedded in this narrative is the claim that Greece will cause a “contagion” through the act of default. Let's be clear - there is no contagion. Multiple countries within the EU have developed their own debt problems in spite of Greece over the past couple of decades, not because of Greece. Each of these countries, from Italy, to Spain, to Portugal, etc. has its OWN sovereign debt disasters to deal with caused by its own fiscal irresponsibility. The only legitimate reason for a so-called contagion is the fact that these countries have been forced into socialist interdependency through the EU structure.
Never forget this: The EU is in trouble not because of Greece, but because of forced supranational interdependency. The EU by all rights should not exist, nor should any centralized supranational single currency system.
I would also point out that globalist institutions like the International Monetary Fund are highly motivated to initiate disaster in the EU, despite some people’s assumptions that the EU is some kind of representative model of globalization. It’s not. If this were the case, then the IMF would not be stiffing Greece on debt aid while continuing to help Ukraine despite Ukraine’s similar inability to pay.
Why would the globalists want a partial breakup of the EU? What would they gain from such an event? That’s easy; they gain crisis, chaos and an opportunity to present a false dialectic.
Europe is not at all representative of what globalists really want in terms of economic and political structure, no matter what many people assume. It is a, rather, a kind of facsimile; a half measure. When Europe hits the bottom of the financial abyss and the bewildered public begins asking what the hell happened, the elites will be there with an immediate explanation. They will claim that it was not the EU’s interdependency that was the problem. Instead, they will assert that the EU was actually not centralized ENOUGH. They will claim that in order for a supranational economy and currency to work, we must also have supranational governance. In other words, the system failed because it needs to be stabilized by global government.
The Fabian socialists will argue that it was the barbaric and outdated institution of national sovereignty that caused the full-spectrum crisis. They will completely gloss over the negative effects of an interdependent economic system and the fact that a lack of redundancy leaves cultures simpering and impotent. We’re all one big human village after all, so we should accept the idea that we all succeed or fail together. Free markets and individual innovation apparently have nothing to do with a thriving economic structure. What we really need is a hive mind amalgamation that turns us all into easily replaceable parts in a massive rumbling lawnmower that chews up our heritage, history and principles for the sake of some arbitrary greater good and the promise of alchemical floating cities in the sky where no one has to work anymore.
The fall of the EU is a means to an end for globalists. There is almost no nation or institution they will not sacrifice if that sacrifice can be exploited to further their goal of total global political and economic dominance. They don’t just want a completely centralized system; they want all of us to BEG them to put that system in place. They want the masses to think it was all our idea. This is the most pervasive and effective form of slavery, when the slaves are manipulated into demanding their own enslavement. When the slaves are fooled into believing their enslavement is something to be proud of — a badge of honor in service of the collective, if you will.
The fall of the U.S. will be no different in this regard. We do not necessarily have a supranational structure like the EU. So our narrative for collapse will be slightly different, and the engineered lesson we are meant to learn will be carefully crafted.
You see, Americans are meant to play the role of the spoiled imperialists who are finally getting what we deserve, an economic punch in our tender parts. We are the new Rome, bread and circuses and all. And when the U.S. comes crashing down like Europe, the Fabians will be there yet again to admonish the greed inherent in national sovereignty and the destructive aspirations of power that must be squelched by a more evenhanded global political system. I don’t really know how many people out there realize this, but we are meant to play the bad guys in the global theater being put on by the elites. Americans are the villains, the rest of the world plays the role of innocent victim, and globalist centers like the IMF and the BIS are meant to play the heroes, coming to the rescue of humanity when all appears lost.
Our debt generation by far outmatches that of the whole of EU nations combined, a fact I outlined in Part 3 of my series One Last Look At The Real Economy Before It Implodes. Unlike Greece, though, the U.S. has the direct option to print fiat at will in order to prolong punishment for our massive debt spending. However, as we have seen with recent market reactions to the very notion of an interest rate hike by the Federal Reserve in September, such an event will trigger extensive outflows from stock markets and herald the end of the “new normal.” Again, why would the banksters do this? Why not keep interest rates at a constant near zero? It is not as if there is any public pressure to raise rates; in fact, it's quite the opposite. Why is the Fed ignoring the hundreds of signals showing that the U.S. is in a recession and pushing ahead with discussion of interest rate hikes despite what one might logically conclude would be in the Fed's best interest?
The Fed knows that the only things propping up American markets are free money and blind faith by the public that banks and government will act to stop any pain or economic suffering, should such a potential for crisis arise. When the free money is gone and that faith disappears, then we will have an epic catastrophe on our hands. The globalists within the Fed know this, and they want this - at least , they want a controlled version of this. The elites NEED the fall of the current U.S. system exactly because this will make way for the rise of what they often term the “great economic reset.” This reset is the next stage in the plan for total global economic centralization.
This is not about contagion. There is no such thing. It is an excuse, a scapegoat designed to distract from the real problem. This is about a concerted effort over the past several decades by internationalists to maneuver Western cultures into a position of vulnerability. When people are weak and frightened, they become malleable. Social changes you would have never thought possible today become very possible tomorrow in the midst of a crisis. I believe we are now seeing the onset of the next great crisis, and the fundamentals of economy support my view. When the entire European system hangs by the thread of Greek debt and the entire U.S. system hangs by the thread of near zero interest rates and blind market faith, something is about to shatter. There is no going back from such a condition. There is only the path forward, and the path forward is not pleasant or comfortable and it cannot be ignored.
We cannot forget that crisis is in itself a distraction as well. Whatever pain we do feel tomorrow, or the next day, or the next decade, remember who it was that caused it all: the international banks and their globalist political counterparts. No matter what happens, never be willing to accept a centralized system. No matter how reasonable or rational it might sound amid the terror of fiscal uncertainty, never give the beast what it wants. Refuse to conform to the dialectic. This is the only chance we have left to get back to true prosperity. Once we cross the line into the realm of worldwide institutionalized interdependency, we will never know prosperity or freedom again.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by justanobserver , June 24, 2015
Brandon,
While I would agree that the U.S. can print fiat at will there exists an exceedingly stupid notion (especially amongst the loony keynesian/modern monetary theorist fools) that anyone else must accept that paper (outside of the United States).
Call it hubris or just the indispensable and exceptional nation delusion.
All of America's failures cannot be laid at the feet of globalists. We elected the idiot shits like Nixon (who trashed the concept of currency backed by real capital and started the ball rolling on side-stepping the Constitution to get trade treaties passed) and Obama (who lovingly licks the balls of those who are throwing away American sovereignity).
We, as a nation, failed to preserve the Republic.
How we get it back is the question.
written by Brandon Smith , June 24, 2015
@observer
Blaming regular people for a lack of vigilance is fine too, but frankly, the elites created modern fiat, so they deserve the bulk of the blame.
I'm sorry, but the vast majority of our problems today are indeed initiated by globalists. They need to go if anything is to improve tomorrow.
written by John Orfandes , June 24, 2015
The problem is how to get rid of the globalists. They have been successful by operating out of the spotlight, they control so much of what we are exposed to, but we see Obama, Soros, or Trump... These people are not the leaders of the pack. When do you hear about the Rothschilds or Rockefellors, or any of the other super elite that control the systems that control the allocations of the monies of this world. How do we root them out, when they can bankrupt the system and cause panic in the financial district that rises up the cost of food to a daily wage. In our enjoyment of all the riches we have been blessed with, we quit watching these people and they have been busy taking complete control.
How do we stop it, step one, unite under this cause, if we can't at least do this, it will be impossible to get these people out.
written by been counted , June 24, 2015
Well John,
it would be nice not to be ruled by the elites, but it has always been that way. We serfs used to live outside the castle walls. Now those same walls are around our minds.
Back to the main point of the article.
The EU was created so that euro-peons could compete in the global markets, where size matters.
As debt increases, control must also increase, or else chaos will ensue, and debt will not be paid. This is not a desirable outcome if you are children of the Roths or Rocker-fellas.
I envision an EU that becomes centrally governed, so that the problems they fear now (contagion) can be controlled.
I also envision the US and Canada and Mexico will also first become and economic union (to compete against China) and then eventually follow the same path to a central government.
That is how things work, we never undo things, we never take laws off the books, we always add to make a more complicated world.
I'll see you all on the next world, and don't be late.
written by Panegyric , June 24, 2015
Brandon,
Thanks for your analysis re: the grand East vs. West spectacle. I had been pretty effectively bamboozled by all the Putin vs. the NWO, BRICS to the rescue business. But you're obviously right about the reality. Anyway that was a major psychological service.
I'm curious if you've read John McMurtry's Cancer Stage of Capitalism. He's adapted a number of articles from it that you can find on global research. One thing he explains really well is the strategy (from Reagan/Thatcher onward) of driving up deficits intentionally with corporate subsidies and tax cuts and radically increased military spending and then using fear of the deficit to gut social spending and reverse the post WWII welfare state. I recommend it.
It occurs to me that the "reset" operation will be delayed until there's nothing left to steal and the pretense of representative government becomes too expensive. It seems that with TTP and the like that elites expect the status quo nation state system to last at least a few more years. What do you think?
Thanks again
written by justanobserver , June 24, 2015
Brandon,
Since modern fiat is no different than the unbacked paper issued in any era where precious metals became unavailable to monarchs and empires, not knowing history falls onto those who do not know it.
I agree that the globalists need to be gone.
written by Spartan , June 24, 2015
Brandon,
I'm reading James Richards book The Death of Money and he argues very strongly that the EU will survive. He mentions a 1200 year history of countries and interests coming together through innovation and technology, infrastructure investment, and labor-management coordination. This results in a lower unit labor cost which makes them much more competitive globally. He believes the Euro is the strongest currency in the world.
Your thoughts?
written by skillyhog , June 24, 2015
First off: +1,000 for use of the circus train picture from The Onion, I had to keep re-starting the first few sentences bc i couldn't stop laughing (still am - i found the article).
Understandably, and predictably, most reaction to all of this is "How can we organize and go get those bastards?!" To me, that seems akin to attempting to put a stop to mud wrestling by jumping in the ring to mud-wrestle the next contender. And the next, and the next. It is my sense that to counter collectivism, YOU (and ME) as INDIVIDUALS must free oursleves first. Discovering truth is the logical first step: YAY US!! And rather than simply keep talking and talking to people, start actually taking action to prepare, make the bold moves for readiness: food, water, medicine, GOTS slowly at first, and even better - find communities (brothers/sisters in arms) who share your view. Just start making the first steps, it feels like going skinnydipping the first time: counter to logic, risky, threat of being wrong ---- but it's also exhilirating, and something amazing happens to your mind: it's liberated and free. THAT, to me, finds an almost-magical way of "sending a message to the universe", and your bounty will be fruitful and multiply. You will find the people. You will find the places. And sleep the sleep of the righteous - it's a good night's sleep, man.
written by skillyhog , June 24, 2015
Quick rejoinder: by getting your mind right now, instilling discipline that comes from prepartion and planning, and understanding the cosmic mis-en-scene of all this, you will be prepared to never, ever back the f**k down and take it bc it's safe. Just one or two who don't blink, and maybe even make a grand sacrifice bc their mind does not even consider capitulation, tranforms others. It's the big-bang of initial energy required to turn tides the other way.
written by Andy Sloan , June 24, 2015
To Panegyric;
"In the mid-seventies when the SALT II (Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty) was being discussed by the U.S. Senate, the author of this article (Iserbyt) arranged for a Soviet defector by the name of Igor Glagolev to come to Maine to participate in a debate with Secretary of Defense Paul Warnke. This debate was arranged by Maine's Chamber of Commerce. Glagolev did a superb job presenting reasons why the United States should not sign onto this Treaty. At dinner the same evening Glagolev informed me that prior to his defection, when he held a very high position in the Kremlin, he sat in on meetings at which David Rockefeller Sr. and Henry Kissinger were often present."
http://www.newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt3.htm
written by Brandon Smith , June 24, 2015
@Spartan
I can say with relative certainty given the current trends that the EU will lose member nations over to the BRICS. That doesn't mean that Europe will disappear off the map, but it does mean that the EU as we know it today will no longer exist.
written by gardengritty , June 25, 2015
Very appropriate picture. Thanks for a bit of comic relief and momentary respite from the madding crowd at the top of the "food chain".
written by Raj , June 25, 2015
Brandon,
I think you are correct. It would appear that the East vs. West is a show for us and a crash is being subtly engineered for the BIS to 'step in and save the day.'
I feel like the Fed is meant to go down too, which is why they will raise rates in September (despite warnings from the IMF) and be seen as causing the crash by doing it too early. They will be scapegoated by the IMF and BIS (who have both already warned of the dangers of a crisis) who will then step in and present a 'solution.'
However I wanted to know your opinion on a potential QE4? Also China is in a bubble right now also. I can't help but feel if the US crashes China will too. But that doesn't fit into the narrative as they would have to survive it a lot better than the West. Is this perhaps why they are buying a shitload of gold?
Keen to know your thoughts.
written by Andy Sloan , June 25, 2015
In the mix of causation of the forthcoming collapse, we can virtually guarantee some false flag terrorist attacks.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/381151/dick-cheney-predicts-another-911-decade-joel-gehrke
written by Lohengrin , June 25, 2015
Brandon Smith is a great political thinker in this momentous time of changes amid mass propaganda deception. But here's an alternate take from inside Europe on bumps in the road for globalist schemes, & the dfferent form they might need to take in Europe ... given what you don't see in news or European web commentary.
The selling of globalism to Europe's viscerally tribal peoples, seems laughable, despite propaganda from Pope Francis etc ... the way it would need to go down here is quite different. There is a 'European culture' but Europeans bristle if you try to push that beyond culture or easy-trading with one another.
(Brandon - Might be a bit too strong to say 'end of EU', but certainly likely is unwinding back to 'EU lite' as circa 1995, more just a customs-free economic trading zone.)
From inside the EU, one can see a deep trend among Europe's common people. Often unstated except verbally among friends, there is colossally escalating local tribalism, fuelled by deep dis-trust of the EU, & also of current national governments who are submissive to international cabals.
Partly it is local languages ... the use of English by internationalists (in Europe too) & in a big country like USA, feeds an illusion that globalism can be sold to people ... but in Europe, people express their real opinions in local dialects, in our more face-to-face cultures, which to people here are more 'real' tho not web-visible.
There is more resistance mentality in Europe in a mass-consciousness sense, though Europeans are much less blowhard individually, and we do much less web-posturing.
But we Europeans have terrific group instincts and a rather admirable inner readiness to get into a mass riot against the government ... which you see enacted quite concretely here. People see the police water cannon lorry going somewhere ... and they have an urge to follow it & oppose it.
Yet, Europeans are a discreet lot individually ... we talk less than Yanks on the web about our real opinons; about gold that we own; and about guns that we own (yes, more than 100 million privately owned civilian handguns, shotguns rifles in the EU ... plus illegal guns, full-auto Kalashnikovs & such, are actually widely available from Balkan mafias etc., just like drugs, the people who want them can find them.)
The future in Europe ... & the danger from global cabals ... may take the form of a bunch of local, very tribalistic nationalisms ... which might take fascist turns in response to crisis, and then co-ordinate as some did in the 1930s.
Many people don't know that in 1930s Europe, there weren't just Hitler & Mussolini & Franco ... countries attacked by Hitler, such as Poland, often had strong-man, fascistic leaders too.
Nowadays, trashing of voters' rights & expectations in Europe, partly by EU, partly by parties like Greece's Syriza that break nearly all their campaign promises their first days in office, is leading to a growing feeling here that only nationalist parties are authentic ... the only ones focusing on worker jobs & incomes.
There is even more & more quiet talk about things like Adolf Hitler taking office in 1933, with 30% German unemployment ... and then 4 years later, in 1937, as Hitler himself publicly chided F D Roosevelt, there were few Germans out of work, while Yank USA was still in ongoing 'crisis'.
The internationalists in Europe may manage the media, & most local politicians & the bond market etc ... but they don't have the people behind them. Global gov etc will not sell here, no matter how bad it gets. The danger tho, is that people here will be tricked by new 'national populists', much as Greek people were recently tricked by their fake 'radical left' new government that is now humiliating itself.
written by Brandon Smith , June 25, 2015
@Lohengrin
It was not nationalism that caused the problems existing in Europe today. It was interdependency and globalism and the average European's unfortunate penchant for passivity in the face of government power. I don't really see any examples of resistance coming out of Europe in terms of government control. I haven't seen anything like a European Bundy Ranch, for example. That is not to say that Europeans should not resist. They absolutely should. However, I think your view that Europeans will not accept globalism is not representative of actual European behavior.
written by deep , June 25, 2015
who made elites so powerful ?as they are now. I mean banks did not put gun to peoples head to get into debt or live beyond their means no one forced sheeples to join elites wars its sheeps ignorance that got them where they are now and its the ignorance that will suffer and finally sleepy people will get chance to wake up . '' there no great teacher then pain and suffering .
written by Brandon Smith , June 25, 2015
@deep
If you live in a bad neighborhood full of criminals and leave your door unlocked, then you deserve part of the blame if you get robbed. However, it is still the CRIMINALS that have committed the crime, not you. You can only blame average people to a point.
Also, yes, banks do hold a gun to people's heads through the manipulation of governments (governments are in most cases nothing but force given legal license). On top of this, the bankers spend billions if not trillions in capital on disinformation and media control. NO regular human being should be expected to endure this kind of constant barrage on their psyche or their freedom. THE BANKERS ARE THE PROBLEM, NOT COMMON PEOPLE. PERIOD.
written by wtf , June 26, 2015
Most media is controlled by non-bankers however. I don't understand your fascination with bankers? There isn't much point controlling the media as bankers can earn money in bull markets, bear markets, economic collapses, economic prosperities and anything else in between. This is what they do. Sure some bankers may have investments in media or may have certain interests in certain outcomes, but this can be said for so many professions / power players. Politicians for example manipulate the media far more often and easily than bankers do. You also don't have to be a banker to be an investor. Just because someone is a billionaire and they invest, and these investments there result in various economic changes etc, it doesn't mean that they're a banker.
written by Brandon Smith , June 26, 2015
@wtf
Your knowledge of the issue is lacking, which is why you don't understand. Central banks and the international financiers behind them control governments and most media outlets. The Economist, the world's premier investment and economics magazine, for example, is controlled by the Rothschild Family, which is why they have a tendency to promote Keynesian economics and globalism. You have much research to do and much to learn. I highly suggest you start with two books:
First, The Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin.
Second, Tragedy And Hope by globalist insider Carroll Quigley.
Here are just two quotes from the latter book:
"In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland's second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November I l, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman "the currency dictator of Europe." This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March Zl, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, "I hold the hegemony of the world."
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
The most influential of international bankers are indeed THE PROBLEM. If you don't understand this, you don't understand a thing.
written by Andy Sloan , June 26, 2015
Not that many make the connection in our time, because the vast majority of mankind are so sunk into spiritual darkness.
But if people want to understand why what is about to happen will occur;
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/27/us/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage.html?_r=0
"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever."
Thomas Jefferson
written by John Doran , June 27, 2015
Great article & some fine comments. Thank you folks.
To blame our plight on Jews is to paint with too broad a brush.
The blame lies with the International financiers/Banksters, I agree. They have been manipulating wars, drugs & slaves (owned or waged) since before Jesus' time.
The only temper or violence shown by Jesus was kicking the moneylenders from his Father's Temple.
Look into the Khazars, who were forced into adopting one of the 3 Abrahamic religions: Christianity, Islam or Judaism, & chose the latter.
I recommend a book: Pawns in the Game, by William Guy Carr, a WWII Canadian naval intelligence officer who spent 40 years researching why the world was not prospering. A history of the Banksters, an eye-opener.
written by John Doran , June 27, 2015
One aspect of the banksters' grab for a world Govt is their hijacking of the entirely worthy environmental movement, & its perversion via money, into false science building a chicken little "The Sky's Falling" faux panic.
They attempt to build the impression of a global problem, which will need a global governance (government) solution.
There has been no global warming now, RSS satellite data which cannot be tampered with, for 18 years 6 months.
I suggest starting at: www.wattsupwiththat.com
This lack of warming is why the scare scam was re-branded climate change, a much safer bet because the climate, as Buzz Aldrin said "has been changing for about 4.5 billion years."
written by John Doran , June 27, 2015
Via wars, vaccines, geoengineering, processed foodstuffs & food wrappings etc,etc etc, the Banksters are intent on a vast global depopulation.
This is why they have propagated the myth, almost universally accepted, so hard has it been sold, that the World is overpopulated.
www.drtimball.com
Put: Overpopulation into the search box.
You get his essay: "Overpopulation: The Fallacy Behind The Fallacy of Global Warming."
www.overpopulationisamyth.com
written by olde reb , June 27, 2015
Vote up!
1
.
Vote down!
This is an excellent analysis. May I cite it in the two mentioned links?
This is the same MO that the IMF and WB (both controlled by Wall Street) have used for decades on the third world. John Perkins writing in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man reveals the CIA has been used to force national debts originated by Wall Street.
If the Minister of Finance or ruler would not impose crushing debt for a few million, the “jackals” would be called in to kill him. Haiti is but one result. Greece and the rest of Europe is but an upgrade of the Wall Street operation.
If the nation cannot not be corrupted, the U.S. military will destroy the country. Ask Qaddafi. Ref. http://farmwars.info/?p=12078 New World Order, Dead Ahead.
Internal memos from WS reveal collection of the fraudulent $18 trillion national debt of the U.S. is the “ultimate goal.” Are you ready for austerity?
Wall Street is currently embezzling $3 billion DAILY that legally belongs to the U.S. government. They use the FRBNY's exclusive control of disbursement of funds from auctions of Treasury securities. Ref. https://www.scribd.com/doc/153024003/Amended-Complaint-Federal-Reserve-w....
Now we know how Goldman Sachs can pay million dollar bonuses
written by Objectivist7 , June 28, 2015
Keed - this link you provide amounts to nothing but vile anti-Semitic propaganda. Brandon ought not allow this jew-hatred on his site. The information the referenced site provides is laughable, in that it includes "or has a Jewish spouse," as one commenter correctly points out.
Brandon should remove your comment and others like it.
written by Brandon Smith , June 28, 2015
@Objectivist
Checked the link - yes, it was a broad scapegoating of all Jews as the enemy without a rational argument, so comment removed. However, it should be known that tangible criticism of a Jewish related issue or an Israeli related issue will not be treated as "jew-hatred" here. People must be sure to back their arguments with facts and remove their bias from the picture.
written by Dr. Georgi Staqnkov , June 28, 2015
Dear Brandon,
excellent disquisition on a very complex topic. I have published your article above on my website
http://www.stankovuniversallaw.com/2015/06/how-the-globalists-push-the-nwo-against-the-dialectics-of-ascension/
with a foreword and today I have posted further comments on this topic that highlight it from the transcendental dimension.
I recommend you to visit our website and read these two articles and then eventually comment on them, which I will publish.
With best regards
Dr. Georgi Stankov
written by Objectivist7 , June 28, 2015
We're on the same page. Rational criticism of a Jewish or Israeli-related issue is fair game. Blanket scapegoating of Jews is not. Unfortunately there is a very real re-ascendance of Jew-hatred in the world today. Thanks for deleting the comment.
written by olde reb , June 29, 2015
At objectivist7
Your comment, addressed to keed, follows the comment from Olde Reb. Your comment expresses your concern for “jew-hatred” in linked articles. Brandon's following comment is that the offending comment and links have been removed.
If your comment is to the articles identified in my comment, I defy you to identify any location where the national origin or religious affiliation of individuals is made. If your reference is to a comment that is no longer posted, I suggest the host identify the nonreference to the post by Olde Reb.
If there is a challenge to the merits of the writings I linked, I would be glad to address specific perceived discrepancies.
written by olde reb , June 29, 2015
In the event there is an interest in the jewish legacy in banking history, I would allow a member of the clan to present the case. Mr. Benjamin Ginsberg in FATAL EMBRACE; JEWS AND THE STATE details numerous occasions where his clan has assisted rulers to inflate and impoverish a nation---and he is proud of it.
I have no position on the subject
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2015
@olde reb
I believe he was referring to Keed's comment and link, not yours...
written by olde reb , June 29, 2015
@ Brandon
Thanks for the clarification. I regret to have missed what keed had written.
If jewish history is of interest, the book THE CONTROVERSY OF ZION by
Douglas Reed appears to have a relevant lengthy review. His conclusion is to tie the clan to war mongering of the U.S. for the recent 120 years. Profit is suggested as a motive.
An interesting issue made by Ginsberg in FATAL EMBRACE; JEWS AND THE STATE is the financiers of London had hyped King John to invade Normandy. The Barons would have had to finance and supply manpower for the invasion. The Barons revolted and lead to the Magna Carta. Ginsberg castigates the Barons for causing the seizure of estates of the financiers, their physical abuse, and their eventual exile.
Again, I pass the citation on only for information. I have no position on the issue.
written by olde reb , June 29, 2015
@ Brandon
You have written: “I would also point out that globalist institutions like the International Monetary Fund are highly motivated to initiate disaster in the EU.”
Surely there are factions in the globalist ranks. The IMF and WB are controlled by Wall Street that have sole veto power and guaranteed 15 % control. Wall Street was instrumental in seizing Mario Draghi on trumped up charges when he visited NY. Mario had sought mitigated pressure on Greece; Wall Street disagreed. He was released from jail after he resigned his post. After he returned to Europe, he was appointed CEO of the ECB.
I do not believe WS wants disaster for the EU. The objective for the EU is submitted to be the establishment of a currency that globalists can inflate. The Federal Reserve is claimed to embezzle a profit of $3 billion daily for Wall Street. Ref: https://www.scribd.com/doc/153024003/Amended-Complaint-Federal-Reserve-whistleblower
It is believed the Euro uses the same Ponzi scheme to enrich the ECB. The European Commission and Wall Street are brothers in common perfidy.
Dominant control is the object.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2015
@Olde Reb
There are no factions within globalist institutions. All decisions are made through pyramid structure with the BIS close to the top. Read Carroll Quigley's 'Tragedy And Hope' for more information on how the cabal operates. The elites are more than willing to sacrifice the EU structure to gain a longer term position for total centralization under the IMF's SDR currency basket (global currency system). I'm afraid the Euro is nothing more than a median step towards this global currency, which is why you are getting the panic in the EU we are seeing right now over Greece. Currency inflation is nothing more than a means to an end - the end being total centralized global governance.
written by Kenguroo , June 29, 2015
@justanobserver
"All of America's failures cannot be laid at the feet of globalists.". Absolutely can. They use all the resources and means of corruption to deceive the public. But, having said that, the public should have known better and always taken everything with a grain of salt. They didn't and therefore failed to preserve the Republic. With regards to "loony keynesian/modern monetary theorist fools" I would strongly disagree. They are neither loony nor fools. The were the people in charge of transferring wealth, and they did a remarkable job doing it. The country is broke and in delusion, and my fear is the general dork out there will never figure out what happened. It means the crime will remain unpunished
written by JohnF , June 30, 2015
@old money never dies
"I also envision the US and Canada and Mexico will also first become and economic union (to compete against China)"
That is the plan, but it can only be achieved if they get the weapons away from the American people.
Because they know most Americans will not give up the Constitution or the Bill of Rights without a fight.
written by ridgepoint , July 04, 2015
Great article that proclaims truth. Those of us who follow this site are probably in agreement over all that Brandon presents. Once awareness comes where are our solutions going to come from? Those of us who believe in our Constitution and liberty are unorganized and, in most cases, sitting as the frogs in the proverbial test tubes while we are boiled alive - in spite of the efforts of sites such as this one. I work in an area in which we are inundated with individuals from all over the world, some legal, some illegal. One thing is for sure - for the most part they know very little about our constitution and are here for financial gain and opportunity. They have little understanding that this opportunity will vanish if our liberty movement is unsuccessful. Most have no fortitude for a battle that will involve sacrifice and possibly endangerment of their lives. The fact that there is a deliberate and thoughtful attack on our constitution and liberty - (and one that is pretty easy to see for thinking people) - seems to mean little to most. As mentioned, Rome is a very apt comparison. May we remain at the ready through prayer, unity, and action.
written by SkepticAl , July 04, 2015
You make some great points. I think the "contagion" we will see is regular people waking up to the scam that is our fiat money system. It's based on confidence. Once that is gone, the collapse will come and, like you have said before, they (TPTB) already have a "solution" to the problem they are creating. The sheeple will BEG for it to go away and, voila, their globalist plans will be put in place with "our" blessing. Great insight once again, Brandon.
