I recently received requests from two different readers, one asking for articles covering the “mindset” of globalists (why they do what they do), and another request for articles covering globalist “occultism.” I find that these two topics are very difficult to pursue with a large number of people for a few reasons:
1) Many people do not accept the reality that a group of financial elitists colluding (conspiring) to obtain total global power even exists. Therefore, in order to delve into the topic of the globalist mindset with these “skeptics,” I would first have to re-cover page after page of evidence showing that they not only exist and collude, but that they openly boast about their plans on a regular basis. This is time consuming, to say the least.
2) For some of the people that do eventually accept the reality of a globalist cabal, the argument eventually arises that “yes, there is collusion, but it is merely driven by greed and profit motive,” and not as nefarious as we conspiracy tin-foil mad-hatters imagine.
3) For others, there is a full acceptance of the reality of an organized globalist cult, but they argue that these people are simply a product of a corrupt and ill-structured socio-political system. That is to say, they think that the globalists are a symptom of the troubles that plague humanity, rather than a cause.
This argument is often made by people promoting their own collectivist agenda in one form or another (socialists, communists, scientific dictatorships controlled by people supposedly much smarter than the rest of us, one world-one mind spiritually unhinged theosophic weirdos, etc.). They claim a new system, their system, is the solution rather than getting rid of the globalists, which they say would only leave a “power vacuum” for more tyrants to take their place.
4) Finally, there are the evangelical revelations seekers obsessed with Armageddon. They fully accept that the globalists exist, that they conspire internationally to gain power and influence towards the goal of a “new world order” and that they are essentially evil minded in their intentions. However, they argue that it is either futile to fight against such people because they are supported by power from somewhere beyond, or they even argue that to fight against the globalists is wrong because it is in defiance of the plan put forward in the Bible.
So, as you can see, it is a veritable circus of horrors whenever I write on the subject of who the globalists really are and what they really want. Beyond that, it is very difficult to examine this subject matter, even with ample evidence, without coming off like a wackaloon.
It is hard enough convincing people of the obvious economic crisis facing America and the rest of the world and convincing them to put in minimal effort to prepare, let alone convincing them of the psychopathic and cult-like nature of the elite behind that crisis. In other words, if you approach someone new to this information cold and hit them right away with tales of luciferians, Washington D.C. child pedo-rings and gay romp power-club parties in the California Redwoods with a giant stone owl called “Molech,” you probably aren’t going to get your foot in the door.
That said, I’ll address the inevitable arguments above very quickly before I begin my analysis of the Globalist mind.
1) Psychopaths tend to naturally gravitate towards positions of power, and despite some foolish assumptions out there that these people are too volatile to play nice with others, they do in fact work together as long as there is a guarantee of mutual benefit.
Elites have conspired throughout history, this is well documented fact. I find it amazing that some folks cannot grasp the idea that they might also be conspiring today. If you need evidence of such collusion, you are welcome to read my articles The Fall Of America Signals The Rise Of The New World Order and Order Out Of Chaos: The Doctrine That Runs The World. If you want to know where to find these people simply look at the memberships of institutions designed specifically to promote globalism - Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations, Tavistock, the Trilateral Commission, The Club Of Rome, Rand Corporation, the IMF, the Bank for International Settlements, ect. Though they often obscure their more malicious intentions, globalists are relatively easy to find.
One might argue that the problem of organized psychopathy cannot be dealt with unless one confronts individual psychopathy. I’m sorry to say that at least 10% of the population (according to psychologist Carl Gustav Jung) at any given time has elements of inborn latent psychopathy and at least 1% is actively psychopathic. You will NEVER remove psychopathy from humanity. It is an inborn quality. What you can do, though, is disrupt or destroy organizations of people that foster and elevate psychopaths. Organized psychopathy is the real and pressing problem.
2) If you need convincing that the globalists are not just “greedy capitalists” out to make a buck at the expense of the world, check out my article Global Eitism: The Character Traits Of Truly Evil People and read some of the quotes directly attributed to them. Their goal is to gain as much power over the masses as possible. They see themselves as modern Pharaohs, not as businessmen. Wealth is a side-note.
3) There have been only fleeting instances of societies without the all-pervasive influence of organized elitism in history. From these minor instances, though, we can see bursts of human potential, productivity and invention, as well as greater respect for inherent conscience and justice. Sadly, no one in the past has ever taken the action of removing elitist groups entirely as a factor of influence.
Anyone who claims that the globalists are nothing more than a “symptom” is probably trying to sell you on an ideology rather than a real solution. The fact of the matter is, we have never lived in a world without the influence of globalist conspiracy. They are like a cancer that has turned psychopathy into a religion. Removing the globalists should be a top priority. NO system is going to succeed, regardless of how brilliantly conceived, unless the elitists are out of the picture.
I would even venture to say that the people who argue that the globalists are nothing more than a symptom are in fact HELPING the globalists by distracting activists away from the real task at hand. Playing at philosophy and theoretical society building will not change the existing power structure in any way, nor will it remove the muzzle of a rifle from the back of your head as you stare down at the ditch that is to become your final resting place.
4) The majority of the Bible is composed of stories of good standing against evil, and I simply cannot take anyone seriously who argues that the Bible demands we sit idle in the face of despotism. I don’t believe in the modernized “Left Behind” interpretations of “apocalypse” and even if I did, different groups have been saying that the end times are right around the corner for ages. Frankly, no one knows or will know if such an event of metaphysical proportions is taking place anyway.
Now, I do believe in full-spectrum crisis and societal collapse, because these events have happened over and over again and can even be reasonably predicted according to past indicators. I also believe that current events are rife with such indicators and that a collapse is taking place in stages today. I also know that there are groups of elites engineering this collapse and I know exactly why because they have openly admitted their goals (read my article The Economic End Game Explained). Apocalypse is not my concern. Right and wrong, justice and tyranny are my concerns. I’ll leave the rest to more omniscient and omnipresent beings.
The Problem We Face Is Organized Evil
Now that the above questions are out of the way we can jump into the core of the problem. And no, the core of the problem is not the “system” we live in per say, or our methodology of living and progressing as a species. Again, there are too many eggheads in the liberty movement that like to pretend they have grand and ingenious new ways of looking at the world, and if only we would just “listen to their brilliant vision” everything would change for the better. When you boil down their philosophies you often find they have no new ideas whatsoever, or that their ideas cannot be implemented because they have not dealt with the elephant in the room — the globalists.
Philosophy without tangible action and verifiable results is ultimately useless in the face of true evil. Intellectual warriors rarely win wars, but they do often die horribly as a result of their naivety and defenselessness.
To answer the question in the title of this article, yes, the globalists are in fact evil and the only misunderstandings are on the part of wide-eyed skeptics that have bought into the idea that “evil” is a moral conception created by religion rather than an inherent quality of human beings.
As Carl Jung discovered in his studies on the collective unconscious, people are born with inherent and conflicting conceptions and traits, or “dualities.” Good vs. Evil is an important duality we all come in to the world dealing with, it is not a mere product of environment or religious influence. That which is “good” is often dictated by what we call “conscience,” which again is an inherent idea or “voice,” and is only partly influenced by environment. The fact of inherent character traits and universal moral codes is present in anthropological studies as well as psychological studies beyond Jung’s very extensive work.
To define evil, we would have to look at those ideas and actions that are opposite inherent conscience. The globalists have basically constructed a festering belief system around everything that is contrary to our moral compass. I will attempt to dissect some elements of that belief system from a secular point of view. Wish me luck…
Occultism
Occultism in itself is not necessarily “evil,” it only means “secret knowledge.” But the history of occultism is plagued by rather evil deeds and attitudes. John F. Kennedy once warned of secret societies and secret proceedings, and with good reason. For thousands of years, occult groups often withheld valuable knowledge from the masses as a means to influence behavior and control the direction of society. This did not have to be “magical” knowledge, whatever that means. Usually, it was scientific or psychological knowledge.
Say for example that a group of elitists withheld detailed knowledge of an impending economic collapse because this knowledge gave them a feeling of superiority and an advantage that they could exploit to gain power over others. Often, occult knowledge, secret knowledge, is driven by the selfish desire of one group to maintain a sense of dominance over another. Is it evil to withhold knowledge that could save lives for the sake of self-elevation? I would say absolutely.
Occultism can also lead to temptations of ever increasing criminality. If groups of people in positions of power maintain a well-oiled machine of secrecy that draws a dark curtain on their behavior, a machine that allows them to cover for each others actions to ensure no repercussions from outsiders, it is only a matter of time before the lack of transparency opens a door to greater evil. One act of evil left unpunished tends to breed many future acts of evil practiced with impunity.
Luciferianism
So yeah, it’s almost impossible to broach this subject without sounding crazy to people who aren’t already familiar with it. But as requested, I’ll take a stab at it.
Do globalists really believe in a devil with a pitchfork and hooves and horns? I really don’t know. What I do know is that many of them believe in the ideas behind the mythology of the figure (even Saul Alinsky dedicated his book ‘Rules For Radicals’ to Lucifer).
The Lucifer mythology is one of rebellion, a rebellion against the the Christian God. But how would this translate to elitist behavior? They define inherent conscience and moral compass (checks and balances put in place by God?) as a “restriction” or imprisonment of the individual, and they seem to only esteem individuals as those seeking their own “Godhood.”
The way liberty proponents value individualism is very different from the way elitists value individualism.
Lucifer as an archetypal figure represents a rebellion against almost EVERYTHING, including nature. Of course, nature is not a toy to be played with selfishly because catastrophe inevitably results. Moral compass is a guide that keeps humanity from destroying itself, and without it civilizations fall. Luciferianism, at the very least, fosters destructive tendencies and rebellion against the very fabric of humanity. With such people at the helm of entire nations, millions if not billions of innocents will suffer in the scorched path of elites seeking to revolt against inherent moral and natural boundaries as they role play in an ignorant daydream of satanic hero worship, and this is without a doubt evil.
Do What Thou Wilt
Attributed to Aleister Crowley, a self-professed satanist, you will see this ideology pop up in globalist circles and pop-culture icons alike. Crowley apologists often argue that the quote it is taken from refers to the “law of love.” But the love of what? The love of others, or the love of one’s self? Do what thou wilt as long as it does not hurt others, or do what thou wilt regardless of the consequences?
The latter interpretation is clearly the one globalists have taken to heart. Since elitists consistently treat the lowly masses as vermin that need to be exterminated for the good of the planet (and their own amusement), I see little indication that they have the ability to conceive of love, let alone adopt a philosophy of love. Do what thou wilt, however the idea was originally intended, has become a rationale for the globalist propensity of crushing others in the name of “greatness”.
Moral Relativism
Evil people are not as immune to the judgments of others as you might think. In fact, many of them become a bit obsessive about people accepting or even praising the things they do. I can only theorize that if in their minds everyone else subscribes to an evil behavior then it is no longer evil, but normal.
Moral relativism is the act of rationalizing a destructive or evil process by claiming that a positive end result or intention washes away responsibility. The ends justify the means. Globalists could not care less about the consequences of their actions to others, but they do feel the need to justify those actions in a way that people will embrace. From my observations, the majority of globalist propaganda revolves entirely around the concept of moral relativism and the lie that good is only about perception while evil is a “gray area,” or an illusion. As Kevin Spacey says in the movie 'The Usual Suspects', “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist…”
The Solution
As stated earlier, it really does not matter what brand of social system we implement. It really does not matter what kind of economic model we employ. It really does not matter if we somehow find a way to promote enlightened thinking on a massive scale. None of it matters if we do not also confront the organized evil of the globalist cabal.
It is interesting how many people strive so hard to avoid acknowledging the fight that is coming by clinging to the notion that the globalists are “misunderstood” or “not important” in the grand scheme of things.
While I work to promote alternative trade models through localism and alternative-security models through community preparedness teams, I also accept that these efforts are a half-measure; mere preparation for an unavoidable conflict between people who hold the contents of their conscience dear (those who view the non-aggression principle as an integral part of a free and healthy civilization), and the globalists, who hold nothing dear except themselves, their cult and their ambitions.
Evil is a part of every human being, just as good is a part of every human being. It is a battle we all struggle with until the day we die. But organized evil is something else entirely. It is not something we have to tolerate, and it is something we can change. Until it is expunged from our society, no other solutions can be fully enacted. Therefore, the solution begins with the end of organized evil, and it is a solution I plan to enact in my own way. The solution begins with the eradication of the globalists.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by ericbasillais , May 18, 2016
Yes, Luciferianism is belived to be correlated with world organized psychopathy.
You do not say how to get rid of those bastards though.
This is difficult for two reasons : firts, they must not know; second, they are spread worlwide and not necessarily all gone public.
If you read french, check my blog:
https://ericbasillais.wordpress.com/
written by mcandell2010 , May 18, 2016
Very great article. I read it. I understood it. And I am going to click "The Fall of America signals The Rise of the New World Order" to read more. I really enjoyed reading your article. I have enjoyed reading a lot of them recently. I am new to the site.
Thanks,
written by coyote , May 18, 2016
Brandon, thanks for your time and efforts to awaken those who need to 'open their eyes' to the reality of evil, and the desires of those who seek dominion over this world. "Satan is the ruler of this world", as it says in our good Book. All that is necessary for evil for conquer is for good men to do nothing in the face of it. I fall into the tin-foil hat crowd; as an aging first-generation baby boomer, I reluctantly but steadily came to believe that everything I was indoctrinated in starting in grade school and with talmudvision was a lie. I don't know if Donald Trump has attended any of the sodomy rites in the redwoods with the 'child sacrifice' statue of Molech. It would, perhaps, not matter in the long run. As you said, the cycles of history repeat again and again. Who could have known it was our "turn in the barrel".
written by woody188 , May 18, 2016
I had to look up "wackaloon" on Urban Dictionary. Thanks Brandon, you're the best!
written by Thomas Dowling , May 18, 2016
Globalist Piss-Ants, in their tiny, sick, disgusting little minds think they are really about something. 99.99% of all Globalists have been manipulated and sold ridiculous nonsense and selfish ideals. They are being used and don’t even “get it”. Their owners would roll any of them “under the bus” in a second. They try to manipulate us “common” folks by selling us more and more ridiculous deceitful nonsense.
http://www.tomdavidd.com/blog/?page_id=30
written by SM , May 18, 2016
Is Donald Trump part of the establishment or an "outsider"? It seems to me that he was and is part of the establishment hood winking the masses. I like to know your opinion, Brandon?
written by Brandon Smith , May 18, 2016
@SM
After his statements on the Fed (he wants to replace Yellen rather than shutting the central bank down completely), and his latest meeting with Kissinger, I am having serious doubts about where Trump stands. Of course, some people will argue that he is "just playing the game" until he gets into office, but that is the same nonsense they used to say about Putin. I think that if Trump is controlled opposition, then it would be a smart play on the part of the globalists. He could easily co-opt at least a quarter of the liberty movement with his rhetoric. We'll have to wait and see.
written by richie , May 18, 2016
brandon,
does "Hillary Clinton" meet the definition of "psychopath"?
written by Brandon Smith , May 18, 2016
@richie
Her behavior and the published accounts of people who know her personally or worked with her indicate that she is indeed a psychopath, and a rather slimy and vicious one at that. The evidence from Mena, Arkansas is pretty damning. The most interesting personal accounts are written by secret service agents who were assigned to protect her. Can you imagine doing that job and then one day realizing what that woman is?
written by just me , May 18, 2016
First, in your second to last paragraph, "....who hold nothing dear accept themselves...." should read except not accept.
Second, because of man's sinful nature the objective "confront the organized evil of the globalist cabal" is really eliminating the "globalist cabal" and their willing fools permanently; at the same time creating societal systems, structures and procedures precluding recurrence.
written by Brandon Smith , May 18, 2016
@Just Me
That is essentially what I said. So, we are in agreement.
written by Implied Violins , May 18, 2016
Lately I have seen quite a few articles on both MSM and alt news websites that have been mentioning the psychopathic, 'reptilian' evil of the 'cabal', and not just on foo-foo sites like Veteran's Today.
For example, I've seen articles on pedophilia concerning the British monarchy and Bill Clinton on Russia Today; an article by Mike Adams, owner of of 'Natural News', the most popular alternative health news site on the 'net which comes right out and calls the 'cabal' reptilians; many similar articles on Sott.net...plus, some similar articles on ZeroHedge.
I am wondering: is there a real split within the oligarchs at the highest level? Are there some who really despise the most evil psychopaths among them, and who want to remove them while maintaining the status quo for themselves? Or...is this whole thing just a ploy to set up a fictitious demonic 'bogeyman' to remove, thus placating the masses once this evil 'cabal' is removed from power?
I am serious about this, because after all the reading I have done (and personal experiences), I do think there really IS something to this Luciferian stuff, and I do wonder if there is a real movement to remove these people, while trying to keep much of the current system together under their control, but maybe with some real concessions to the people.
I hope this isn't just wishful thinking, but seeing these articles on front pages and not just on the pages of a David Icke book anymore is really making me wonder...
written by Angel , May 18, 2016
This all can be easily explain by reading and understanding the apocryphal books of the Bible (compilations of books)
translated and edited by the fallen ones.
The book of Enoch is very clear describing the root of evil (live, backward) anything against the natural divine order.
Those beings use the natural divine order and mess it up but they do not know how to create anything in harmony with the divine order.
The fallen ones are even mentioned with names and the numbers of them.
written by Brandon Smith , May 19, 2016
@Implied
My understanding is that all the sites you listed are pretty much liberty movement related and I think most of us in the alternative media are aware of an "occult" nature to the globalists. I don't know about the whole "reptilian" thing. If someone is referring to the reptilian portion of the brain, I think I would agree with that to a point. If we are talking about interdimensional shapeshifters, I would personally have to bow out. I think that in the face of true human evil, people have a tendency to recoil. We want to explain it away with the metaphysical rather than accepting the reality that such evil resides somewhere in us all.
I can't say there isn't something otherworldly about it, but I've known evil people, and they don't need to be reptilian to do the things they do.
I do agree that the globalists are willing to sacrifice portions of their cult in order to throw off the masses and make us believe we have "won". In fact, I fully expect them to sacrifice the U.S. and the Federal Reserve. But they would only do this as a trade-off to further their goal of globalization. That is to say, when the elites cut off an appendage, it is not because they are in conflict with the appendage. Rather, they cut off the appendage in order to grow back something new. Internal conflicts within the NWO are highly unlikely. Cults generally tend to be of one mind.
written by Implied Violins , May 19, 2016
Brandon,
I also agree that there is something to the 'reptilian brain' thing, as it seems there are portions of the reptilian brain (or R complex) that, when damaged or absent due to genetic defects, result in psychopathy: the inability to feel empathy or compassion for others. And the effects of this on society when psychopaths take control were presented very well in clinical fashion by psychologist Andrew Lobaczewski in his seminal work, 'Political Ponerology', which is a must-read, IMHO.
As for the otherworldly things I referenced, of which I am seeing on some well-travelled web pages at this time (most recently on Dave Hodges' 'Common Sense' site)...I am personally convinced there is something to it, and that awareness of what this is may well be very important in the quite near future. I am, as you, a scholar who will not commit a single word to a page without prolonged study and references to back me up, and I am also a scientist - who has worked on government projects which, in hindsight, merely solidified my need to research this phenomena.
Anyway, if you are interested at all in discussing this further, just let me know. Email would be best, if you are interested and can spare the time - which I know is short currently.
(BTW, I posted some of what I have learned on the ZH thread to this very article.)
Thanks again, and I truly appreciate your open-mindedness and thorough approach to all you do, as it makes articles such as this much more palatable to those who would otherwise question you, as you are certainly writing from a very 'grounded' space.
written by woody188 , May 19, 2016
@Implied Violins
Some of the sites you've cited I believe are full spectrum dominance sites designed to identify and control any opposition to globalization. It's not any coincidence they want you to believe in an outside party, demons, aliens or whatever, influencing events. That is part of their plans to unite the world under their financial and spiritual control. Create the problem then present the solution.
written by Pablo , May 19, 2016
If we look back in time, we, the peasants, have always lived outside the walls of the castle. Inside the walls lived the owners of the land, and they allowed us to work the land, to feed ourselves, and pay rent and provide goods and services to the owners.
I believe this is the analogy for today's globalists.
We still work and pay taxes, but we really don't own the land, just miss a few tax payments to figure out who really owns the land.
What has changed since the time of kings and castles is that the wall is now made of glass, and we can see the machinations of the elite, with the help of authors like Brandon.
written by shutupnsing , May 19, 2016
100% Grade A Prime EVIL! Brandon rightly credits the psychopath, but it goes much deeper and darker. Ann B coined the term "Diabolical Narcissism" and brilliantly lays it out here for all to see http://www.barnhardt.biz/2016/...deo-is-up/
WARNING: You will recognize people you know here. :-(
written by woody188 , May 19, 2016
@ Brandon
I'll just refer you to: http://redefininggod.com/2016/...glomerate/
Ken's site is full of good information. I think you'll appreciate his site a lot.
I think a lot of people noticed the changes to ZH over the last couple of years. Or how Alex Jones and Infowars has gone all in with an extreme US right wing slant. That is the dead giveaway. Those that are trying to divide us are probably with the globalists.
Going way back, I used to be a regular on Doug Thompson's Capitol Hill Blue, but then Doug got an NDA, and he revealed it in a news story. Less than 24 hours later, that story is pulled and then his whole writing style changed. Now they just list the standard Reuters/AP regurgitation like any old newspaper. Sad.
I even hesitate to list these sites as people will defend them as their champions of information. I'd rather one find out on their own, as that is the only way to true acceptance. At any rate, there it is, pick away.
written by Brandon Smith , May 19, 2016
@Woody
Well, I would have to call nonsense on the Zero Hedge accusation. They have published ALL of my articles critical of Putin and Russia.
written by JH , May 19, 2016
There are plenty of people that are content with their lives, despite any external power structures that might be in place. What is it that those people are missing? If a person is already happy, should he become discontented over this information? I'm familiar with the more "mainstream" conspiracy arguments (so there's no need for this to go into a discussion about why the Fed is bad, for example), but what exactly are the globalists keeping from us and why do we need it? Does a man not create his own contentment? Or are there deeper, perhaps metaphysical, implications that we should be worried about?
written by Brandon Smith , May 19, 2016
@JH
I don't know anyone that is truly "content with their life" in this day and age, but I know plenty of people who have settled for less than they want. Where are these magically content people you speak of? Many slaves can be conditioned to grow accustomed to their slavery. Many German citizens were rather content with totalitarianism for a time. Frankly, those people are doomed in history. They end up as cannon fodder or desperate refugees. The blissfully ignorant are never "content" for long.
We can explain to them all week what has been taken away from them by the globalists, but if they have lost their conception of freedom then there is not much to be done except to leave them to their fate. They are not my concern. Ultimately, only the truth and the people who care about it are my concern.
written by JH , May 19, 2016
Are you effectively saying that a person can't be content unless he has the luxuries normally only afforded to globalists (i.e., the things that globalists have taken from rest of us)?
I acknowledge that ignorance is a major obstacle to uprooting the power structure (and to contentment in general) and I agree that it's a pervasive problem, but it seems that you're saying that it is impossible to be a happy, non-ignorant non-globalist. Is that right?
I do agree that some degree of globalism exists. I'm not condoning it, but it seems to me to be a waste of time to spend ones efforts trying to move an immovable object, rather than trying to improve ones personal circumstances in a more direct way. If I make $30k a year, it's a better use of my time to try to get an otherwise comparable job paying $100k than to try to uproot the globalist regime overnight. Not that you're wasting your time, but what you're saying is probably irrelevant to most people, because they need to worry about tomorrow. The possibility that their worries were created by globalism doesn't eliminate the immediate circumstances that created those worries.
As you alluded to, the ultimate problem is that the psychopaths and non-psychopaths play by different rules. How can we overcome globalism without abandoning healthy values? That's why I ask about what a person needs to be happy. If the problem is that globalists are committing crimes to further their control over the world's resources, wouldn't we be doing a similar thing by taking action, I assume of a physical nature, against globalists? I'm only asking where the line is and what exactly we're after.
written by Brandon Smith , May 19, 2016
@JH
No, that is not what I said at all. I'm saying that people can be conditioned to be accustomed to very terrible situations, and that your idea of "contentment" may be skewed. Which is why I asked you to show me where these content people are. They may not be as content as you might think.
If you feel that it is a waste of time to deal with globalists then by all means, do nothing. Again, people that do not care enough to act are not my concern. I do not agree in the slightest that the globalists are an "immovable obstacle". I think this is a nihilist's perspective and not representative of reality. No one has ever TRIED to remove the globalists from power, so it is impossible to know whether or not they are "immovable".
I also don't know what you mean by "healthy values". If you are referring to values of conscience, then self defense IS a healthy value. If a group of people is seeking to enslave you or destroy you and those you care about, you destroy them. There is nothing immoral about this and frankly, my conscience will be completely clear after I see the last globalist gone. If you are looking for specifics as to the "how to" then you might be a fed looking for a 'conspiracy to commit' charge.
written by South Florida Oath Keeper , May 19, 2016
Beautifully written, Brandon! Concise, to the points, informative and thought provoking!
written by 348wby , May 19, 2016
even if you just pass this along to other people this guy needs a hand and this is some thing that we can and should do some thing about.....if nothing else just pass this link to your freinds please..
gofundme.com/alanrdowning
written by JH , May 19, 2016
Ha, I'm not a fed. But that's just what a fed would say, isn't it? Either way, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you've probably attracted plenty of attention before I ever visited this site.
It's a fair point about healthy values, but the question is about what constitutes enslavement. That's why I'm asking about what is necessary for contentment and what the goal is. I've spent plenty of time thinking about this stuff, not as much as you I'm sure, but I can't seem to escape the conclusion that all of this is a matter of perspective.
To your first point in response to me asking about whether a non-ignorant non-globalist could be happy, that's pretty much exactly what you're saying when you say that contented people can't be found. Is it not? To me, contentment is about freedom and satisfaction in ones actions. A person can always act freely - it's the results that aren't guaranteed. If I'm a slave to infringements on liberty by a globalist regime, I'm just as much a slave to the laws of physics. However, the laws of physics don't prevent me from jumping off a cliff, but do prevent me from flying once I make the jump. I take it you're not discontented about the analogous reality of gravity, which is the point that I'm trying to make about things being a matter of perspective.
And no one has tried to remove globalists from power? What is it that you're doing here and many others are doing elsewhere? But it hasn't happened, not because of the power of globalists, but because of the power of the unknowing masses. Above I mentioned that you're not necessarily wasting your time (because you are speaking to those masses), but the system won't really change until people gain the conscientiousness at the individual level to free themselves from the smoke and mirrors, both internal and external to the person. There's not much of a difference between a person that hangs on every word of Hillary Clinton and a person that hangs on every word of David Icke, for example. Neither person has much chance of actualizing as a person, which to me, is a far better goal than recovering your stuff from the globalists.
written by Brandon Smith , May 19, 2016
@JH
Inherent conscience and archetypal dualities dictate what is right and wrong. There is no matter of "perspective". What you are promoting is essentially moral relativism, which I already addressed in the article.
Most people are born knowing what is evil, what is destructive, and what is enslavement. They can be conditioned over time to ignore the voice of conscience, but it will always remain in the form of regret and guilt.
The only people who do not seem to have a voice of conscience or suffer from regret are psychopaths. Many are born, some are made. Again, right and wrong are intuitively concrete and universal, which is why most people do not become murdering tyrants, even on a small scale.
I never said that content people cannot be found. I said I don't know any of them. You have a bad habit of trying to put words in my mouth which does not inspire me to continue this discussion. What I said was, the people YOU think are content may not be, and that your idea of their contentment may be skewed. You are talking about hypothetical people, not real people. Show me the REAL people you are referring to and how they are content.
The laws of physics are a part of nature, the laws of government are often anti-nature. Your comparison is not valid.
Working to educate people on the virtues of freedom and defending that freedom is not the same as TAKING THE ACTION to defend freedom and physically remove the globalists. Again, I already addressed the nonsensical argument that individual enlightenment alone will make a difference. Enlightenment achieves nothing tangible unless the globalists are also removed. An enlightened slave is still a slave.
You are in no position to determine who has a chance of "actualizing" and who does not. You can only support people who do act, and forget about the people who refuse to act.
What you are doing here is attempting to argue points I have already addressed in detail in the article. I'm not seeing the purpose in this discussion beyond an endlessly circular intellectual tennis match (some people enjoy mental masturbation, I am not a fan). I am not interested in convincing you personally of anything, and you have clearly already made up your mind that inaction is what you prefer.
written by ericbasillais , May 20, 2016
Just that I forgot to thank you, Brandon Smith, not only for that unique post but also for the long-term effort of vision you provide here.
I'd like to underline a major difference between France and USA : here only drug dealers carry weapons...
And what with survivalist preparedness, it's more to cope with atomic war consequences.
written by coyote , May 20, 2016
"If you are looking for specifics as to the "how to" then you might be a fed looking for a 'conspiracy to commit' charge."
This is a great reminder to those in the Liberty Movement, Brandon !! BE CAREFUL what you say on the internet ! (or anywhere in public...
written by Jason Bair , May 20, 2016
If anyone wants to know the deepest not publicized facts about Hillary Clinton listen to Larry Nichols on youtube. He was the one who made them and repented of his evil doings and is now trying to expose all their dirty secrets.
written by Gary Leaf , May 20, 2016
A good balanced article.
I think the globalists are even more deceived than we are, believing themselves "godlike" and somehow separate from the rest of humanity. I wonder if the suffering they cause even registers, let alone an understanding that crimes against their own brothers will eventually come back on them.
Immunity from the consequences of wrongdoing could cause this. Also their ability to create an alternative [false] reality and have it swallowed whole by the masses could cause them to develop a superiority complex. But they themselves have been duped into forsaking their inheritance with Yehovah.
I think that we will suffer these guys and girls a little while longer, and that our hope for deliverance is to rediscover the Laws of Yehovah our Creator and obey them. Thats what Ive chosen to do anyhow. He is the only power-broker I trust to act in our interests.
Hillary may be a fictional character. See; dallasgoldbug
written by TonyRUs , May 21, 2016
There is a 5th group, similar to the 4th. But they believe there will in fact be Armageddon followed by the second coming (whether it is right around the corner, I have no idea). And it may be futile to fight to prevent it, but it is certainly not futile to fight to alter its timings, delay it as long as possible, and alter the extent it affects us and our families. And I’m not suggesting some predestination against our will, only that God knew that human nature, while we are on this ‘fallen’ earth, would inevitably take us to this end (and He's planned for it, I assume.)
And in fact, not only is it NOT wrong to fight against the globalists, but that it is our duty TO fight against them. Because the will to fight, the preparation and training, and the hope in the next life (we ARE all going to die, you know), is more about our own personal morality and character development while here. In spite of what some of the Christian world believes as you mentioned, God is not a pacifist. (That is usually their excuse for inaction and/or cowardice.)
I should think you’d welcome members of group 5 to fight alongside you.
written by Brandon Smith , May 21, 2016
@Tony
If they are willing to stand against tyranny, I really don't care what they believe. I'll even fight alongside an atheist as long as he believes in freedom and isn't a pretentious zealot against those who are religious.
written by Bird60 , May 23, 2016
Thank you for the effort you make in writing. Your thoughts are always well put together and I think most effectively communicated. Your articles make me feel not so alone in my perceptions of our world these days. Again, most appreciated.
written by Ridgepoint , May 23, 2016
Great article and a vast undertaking to try and explain it all. We could all argue our various world views and never come to unity on all points. I simply appreciate the fact that Brandon is taking a stand against tyranny. I consider myself Christian in my world view but believe the founder and initiator of our faith is probably the most misrepresented man in history by most of His followers. He stood with people who acknowledged their feet were made of clay against the worst tyranny of His time - religious hypocrisy. It was the religious "right" that put Him on the cross and they persuaded the political power of the day (Rome) to get the job done. I would encourage all those who claim Him and come here to be less concerned with winning arguments and more concerned about standing. Respect is earned through lifestyle more often than with words. I have special ops. friends who do not believe in our present form of government but do stand with their brothers in arms. There concern if for their welfare and safety - sometimes more than what we as a nation have become. It is a lesson we should apply here. Thanks for biting off a large bite here Brandon.
written by Wm W Fawell , December 09, 2016
What Brandon writes is all true, what he has never understood (and we've come to blows) is that the only remedy is to remove the steering wheel from the car, (i.e. remove the system of government that allows "cunning, ambitious and unprincipled men" from using the reins of government by removing the reins).
It's not that hard; simply move from a govt'ing system that rules over the people, to one where the people rule over their govt. This requires a highly organized decentralization of govt and you can find the manual for it in our US Constitution. America's problem is that our Constitution is ignored and 90% of our laws and control over our money and finance has been removed from the powers of Congress.
Want to get back to the garden? Try Liberty Legislation at scienceofliberty.us. Four bills before Congress today, which if passed would change the entire operating system of government overnight and force the decentralizing forces of a State of Liberty upon our govt. It will force a tsunami through both domestic and foreign policy the changes EVERYTHING! much as changing lead numbers on an Excell spread sheet. Want an example? How about the 10th Amendment, powers the Congress no longer has time for would naturally flow back to the States and that is just a single example but by no means the only one,... just the tip of an iceberg of change. Remember, Geo Washington said that "Liberty, once taken root, is a plant of rapid growth."
TRY IT, YOU'LL LIKE IT... Serfs Up America!
written by This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , May 04, 2017
I lost my brother in law on flight 93 on 911,my great grand parents who were organic farmers in Russia murdered by the Nazi ss,my dad recently died from mind control medications,my mom was given a cancer virus with a polio shot in childhood,then in later life developed lung and other cancer then chemo and irradiated to death.I have been tortured by this same mentality for decades of my life including being conned into medications,then part of a mind control program.I like the idea of organizing self defense teams which seek out and destroy the weapons systems used against the peoples,and toppling the king pins,then working their way through the "ranks".Ubuntu by M. Tellinger is a good model of loving,caring,sharing,celebrating,goodness lifestyle,and we the people deserve to live in a beautiful and virtuous fashion as this.I give thanks to all the truth-freedom-love-caring-goodness-spirited ushers out there like yourself,M.Tsarion,D.Icke,Dr.R.Blalock,M.Passio,J.Maxwell,and others.These great beings and others are my inspiration to live and strive and share,and are mentors who raised me in consciousness.
