In my article 'Brexit: Global Trigger Event, Fake Out Or Something Else?', published before the U.K. referendum vote, I outlined numerous reasons why I believed the Brexit was likely to pass. As far as I know, I was one of very few analysts that stuck to my call of a successful Brexit right up until the day of the referendum instead of slowly backing away as the pressure of conflicting polls increased. My prediction was verified that evening.
In my post-Brexit commentary, which can be read here, I then outlined why so many analysts in the mainstream and even in the liberty movement were caught completely unaware by the referendum results. Today, however, I now see hundreds of analysts using the same talking points I argued before the Brexit, but still missing the first and most VITAL underlying truth. The core reason why I was able to discern the Brexit outcome was because I accepted the reality that the Brexit does not hurt globalists — in the long run, it actually helps them.
Now, I fully understand the excitement surrounding this event. For many people it was a complete surprise because they assumed that international financiers and the ever-pervasive global elites would do anything to stop it from happening. It feels like a kind of revolution; a pointy stick in the eye of the beast. While I applaud the people of the U.K. for their ongoing battle for sovereignty, I can assure you that the Brexit is NOT an obstacle to the plans of globalists.
What is rather amazing to me is the number of people that, before the referendum vote, were arguing that the elites would "never allow" the Brexit to continue and were thoroughly convinced they would use their influence to disrupt it. Now, in the face of a successful vote, those same people now argue that the elites had no influence over the Brexit, and do not benefit from its passage.
I would remind readers that it was actually "pro-EU" globalist puppet David Cameron himself that presented the prospect of a referendum to exit the EU. While some may argue this was bungling on the part of Cameron, I think this is a rather foolish notion. Cameron does what he is told like every other elitist owned politician. Furthermore, the behavior of internationalists leading up to the Brexit was rather strange, hinting to me that they were preparing for a Brexit surprise.
Globalist financiers like George Soros jumped into the markets and bet in favor of stocks going negative, indicating prior knowledge. Hilariously, Soros' advisers are now playing damage control by claiming that Soros "lost money" on bets on the English Pound. While they admit he did "make profits" on all of his other investments due to the Brexit, they will not say what the magnitude of those investments were, nor have they provided evidence supporting any of the information they have given to the media on his losses on the Pound. Truly, a slapdash lazy play at spin control.
The Federal Reserve’s Janet Yellen used the Brexit as the primary reason for the latest rate hike delay, mentioning that such conditions may have influence "for some time to come". This indicates she may have had prior knowledge of its coming passage.
And the world’s central bankers all convened in Basel, Switzerland to take marching orders from their masters at the Bank for Internationals Settlements right before Brexit voting commenced, something they most likely would not do if the Brexit was destined to fail rather than prevail.
Not only did the globalists through David Cameron originally introduce the concept of the Brexit vote, they also apparently knew that the U.K. referendum would succeed.
As I originally stated in my prediction article:
“…the failure of the EU does not necessarily mean a failure for the internationalists. For groups of globalists that promote an ideology of Fabian Socialism, a breakdown of the EU, whether partial or total, can be used as leverage for a larger and more centralized global power structure in the long term. Mark my words, when the system comes crashing down (whether after the Brexit or after another trigger event), internationalists will say that the EU failed not because it was centralized, but because it was not centralized ENOUGH.”
“If the Brexit succeeds, the globalists can allow the market systems they have been inflating for years to finally crash (at the speed they choose). They can then blame those dastardly “far-Right extremists” in the U.K. for triggering a domino effect within the global financial system, conveniently scapegoating British conservatives, moderates and sovereigns for a breakdown that was going to happen eventually anyway. Their solution will once again be to argue for the end of “barbaric” conservative principles and install complete centralization and socialism as the cure.”
Already, this narrative is being presented by internationalists in the aftermath of the referendum.
Bloomberg writes that the Brexit “casts a dark shadow on the world’s great move to openness,” as if globalism is a bastion principle of free markets rather than the murderer of free markets and the outright tyrannical socialization and centralization of everything. European elites are out in droves admonishing the Brexit as a move towards dangerous nationalism and isolationism. The Chinese premier is in the media warning of a “butterfly effect” in global markets caused by instability in “certain countries,” obviously referring to the U.K. and the EU. His solution? He wants even more “enhanced coordination” among all the economies of the world (Interpretation: more centralization).
EU officials only continue to strengthen my predictions by calling for an EU superstate in response to the Brexit; in other words, a completely centralized Europe.
And, Bloomberg has reported on Mario Draghi's recent call for a "new world order" in response to the UK referendum in which central bank policies around the globe are completely coordinated. Bloomberg removed the word "NEW" from the article's title an hour after it was published. Go figure; I guess mentioning the "new world order" was just a little too honest.
Of course, Draghi does not mention that all central banks are ALREADY coordinated through the Bank for International Settlements, which is why numerous central bank heads were at the BIS when the Brexit vote was underway. What Draghi is pushing for is open centralization among the world's central banks - the next step towards a single global central bank and a single global currency system.
For more information on why the elites desire an economic crisis and what they hope to gain from it, read my article 'The Economic End Game Explained'.
In my prediction article I also stated in part reference to the Jo Cox murder:
“…the goal may only be to perpetuate a longer term narrative that conservatives in general are a destructive element of society. We kill, we’re racists, we have an archaic mindset that prevents “progress,” we divide supranational unions, we even destroy global economies. We’re storybook monsters.”
“The murder of Jo Cox has had a minimal effect on Brexit polling numbers. In the end, the elites may find Thomas Mair more useful as a mascot for the Brexit after the vote, rather than before the vote.
So now the Brexit movement, which is conservative in spirit, is labeled a “divisive” and “hateful group”, and if the referendum is triumphant, they will also be called economic saboteurs.”
The concept of a dangerously volatile and destructive populist movement for sovereignty is being heavily pushed in the mainstream media. The racist angle is now being implemented, with the MSM warning that racism is on the rise in the U.K. due to the Brexit campaign.
Most if not all of the developments I warned of when I predicted the Brexit are also coming true. So, if I am as correct about the motives behind the Brexit as I was correct about the outcome of the Brexit, here is what will probably happen in the coming months as the drama unfolds.
Federal Reserve Catch-22
All eyes will soon be on the Fed to see if the central bank behind the world reserve currency will take some kind of action to mitigate the possible negative effects of the Brexit. The problem is, the Fed has created a catch-22 scenario here; not for them, they are happy to instigate an equities crisis as long as the timing is right. Rather, they have created a catch-22 for the markets.
If the Fed raises rates to prove they can, stock markets will see this as a shock move and initiate a sell-off. If the Fed lowers rates or institutes negative rates, the public will see this as an act of desperation and a loss of credibility. Really, the only safe measure the Fed can take from now on is to do nothing. I highly doubt that they will do nothing. In fact, even in the face of the Brexit I still believe the Fed will raise rates a second time before the end of the year. Why? This is what the Fed has always done as recession takes hold. Historically, the Fed raises rates at the worst possible times. As with the Brexit, I am going to have to take the contrary position to most analysts on this.
Referendum Catch-22
The globalists have conjured an interesting paradox with the UK referendum. Look at it this way; even if you believe that the globalists were "caught off guard" by the Brexit, one must admit that it is still in their best interest to initiate a crash.
First, the elites spent so much time warning of the doom that would befall the world if a Brexit vote succeeded, they must now fulfill their own prophecy or appear foolish and impotent.
Second, if globalists and the central banks they control act too aggressively to stall a market plunge, they are sending a message to all other EU nations that they should not worry about seeking their own referendums, because the central banks will save the day if they do. More referendums mean exponential crisis in equities. So, markets will crash if the central banks don't act, and they will crash if central banks do act.
This is all an academic discussion, though, because central bankers fully intend for the existing system to at least partially crash. They simply want to decide the pace of the implosion. Most will do this through jawboning and minor policy maneuvers, but not much else. The Federal Reserve is the only wild card in this equation.
Slow Grind Towards The U.S. Elections
While the Brexit vote is a considerable shock to global markets, and there is a likelihood of referendums in other European nations, I do not believe the Brexit alone is enough to cause the kind of economic crisis the elites are seeking. There needs to be a one-two punch combo here, and the second punch has not arrived yet.
What form will it take? I have no idea. I do believe that with the Brexit drama in full swing, the timing is perfect for certain unstable EU banks, including Deutsche Bank, to announce insolvency. This could be the next moment of shock. That said, there are hundreds of possible trigger events ready and waiting to be exploited.
So far it would appear that equities markets in particular are in for a slow grind down (with sporadic but short lived rallies) going into the U.S. elections. I would not expect much to happen until the Fourth of July holiday has passed and I would expect low trading volume to persist until then. I believe that by the time November arrives the global economy will be in a clear and visible recessionary mode. This does not mean a "collapse" in the Hollywood sense will be in full swing, but our fiscal structure will be visibly worse off to even the most oblivious citizens.
A Trump Presidency
In light of the Brexit I’m going to have to call it here and now and predict that the most likely scenario for elections will be a Trump presidency. Trump has consistently warned of a recession during his campaign and with the Brexit dragging markets lower over the next few months, he will probably be proven “prophetic.”
Those who read my articles regularly know that I do not trust Trump and that I think his behavior signals that he is controlled opposition, but this is really beside the point. Even if Trump is a legitimate anti-establishment conservative, his entry into the Oval Office will seal the deal on the economic collapse, and will serve the globalists well. The international banks need only pull the plug on any remaining life support to the existing market system and allow it to fully implode, all while blaming Trump and his conservative supporters.
If Hillary Clinton, a clear establishment puppet, is the chosen one, and markets crash after her inauguration, then the establishment gets the blame. However, if Trump becomes president, and markets crash, then conservative and freedom movements get the blame.
The mainstream media has been consistently comparing Trump supporters to Brexit supporters, and Trump himself has hitched his political wagon to the Brexit. This fits perfectly with the globalist narrative that populists and conservatives are killing the global economy and placing everyone at risk.
Sovereignty Is The Villain
Imagine that the economic and political events of our world are for the most part a cleverly staged piece of cinema. The globalists are writing a screenplay for that cinema and we are all supposed to believe that the movie we are watching is real life rather than an engineered fantasy. The Brexit in our story is an act of “evil sovereignty activists” and “right wing extremists” who lure ignorant people away from the light of globalism using “emotion” rather than logic.
These conservatives and populists promote barbaric principles of nationalism that no longer serve humanity in our age of “reason” and multicultural “civility.” Globalism is the future and pro-sovereigns are holding the world back from “progress.”
This will be the narrative pressed in politics and social discussions from now on. The story the globalists are writing is one of the terrorism of selfish freedom movements, how they brought the planet to the verge of complete collapse, and how globalism and collectivism finally “triumphed” and saved humanity.
Divisions Between Young And Old
An interesting and very manipulative propaganda campaign being put in motion around the Brexit is the idea that the U.K. referendum represents a division between older generations and younger generations. The mainstream media argues that older generations in the U.K. that have already benefited from the EU are now “taking it away” from the younger generations and essentially screwing them out of their futures.
Anyone who understands the root failings of the EU and the fact that it has been on the edge of collapse for the past several years knows that such arguments are patently ridiculous. The EU has been beneficial to no one except in minor part to perpetually insolvent nations and peoples. The EU aids these folks by stealing from solvent nations and peoples. The Scottish were extremely anti-Brexit, for example, exactly because they have become a welfare dependent society and they know where their bread is buttered. Most Muslim refugees aren’t flooding into the EU on the premise that they plan to start from scratch and work their way towards prosperity. They march into the EU on the promise of free goodies.
Yes, according to recent polls around 73% of voters 18 to 24 years old supported the EU, but around 27% did not. Does this 27% not count? People aged 25 to 34 voted 38% in favor of Leave. Anyone over age 35 was increasingly more likely to vote Leave. Are people in their late 30's now considered "old"? This is hardly an example of the "old" destroying the precious collectivist futures of the young.
To claim that the Brexit was about young versus old is clearly a lie, but we should expect that this narrative will be pushed further. The globalists need to own the minds of the next generation, and they hope to do so by blaming all their future economic woes on the kinds of sovereignty movements that voted for the Brexit. The young are often desperate to believe that they are wiser than the old, desperate to assert their place in a world they don't yet understand because they have little experience in it, and desperate to prove that new ideas (usually old failed ideas rehashed) are better than traditional ideas. The elites know this, and are quick to con the young with the concepts of futurism.
The Long Game
The great weakness among economic analysts and many independent analysts is their refusal to examine the long game of the elites. They become so obsessed with the day to day parade of stock tickers and the month to month central bank policy meetings that they miss the greater trends. We can focus intently on each drop of water that makes up a tidal wave and forget that we are at the edge of the beach staring down death.
The Brexit is part of a globalist long game that is designed to finally and completely demonize sovereignty movements.
Think about it for a moment — what better way to remove the only obstacle in their path? The globalists create an economic crisis and then foster conditions by which their primary opponents (liberty activists) get BLAMED for it. They then swoop in as the heroes of their little cinema after the damage is already done and offer their solution: complete globalization. With enough people destitute from a global financial calamity, they may very well be begging the elites for help. This is not to say that the elites will ultimately succeed (I believe they will fail), but that does not stop them from making the attempt.
I realize this is not what many in the liberty movement want to hear, but this is reality. This does not diminish the value of a British movement for sovereignty, but it does demand that we temper our celebration and recognize when we are being targeted with fourth-generation warfare. If we accept the fact that the Brexit is an event the elites plan to exploit for their own ends, then we can identify the threat and deal with it. If we continue the delusion that the Brexit is some kind of slap in their face when it is not, then we allow them yet another weapon in their arsenal of propaganda.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by gldslv , June 29, 2016
Excellent overview. It explains the incessant references to racism here in the US anytime a pro-Trump opinion is voiced in the media. But, like global warming, a dumbed down nation must be retaught how to walk.
written by John Doran , June 29, 2016
From all I've read, including William Guy Carr's 1955 book, Pawns in the Game, you seem to be hitting the nail on the head.
How do you figure China & Russia into your predictions?
Best,
JD
written by PeterK , June 29, 2016
Just a though backed by nothing-no answer needed
What if Europe is broke,or there is no will to save one state after another anymore like greece,cyprus etc...And as Soviet union 27 years ago is falling.One state after another ,leaving euro,leaving euroblock,going back to previous nationalities,own currencies.
Many bancrupcies and of course nice crises globaly pointing not on central banks mistakes but actualy votes of people.How convenient for bankers isnt?
States can devaluate their own currencies at will and of course we cant forget about that one world currency and centralization.(how to connect them to this chaotic breakup).I think all eyes will look at IMF or Brics (people will request no more competition and differencies between them,because they need to take care of earth,to save the world,to do something,because who else can carry such responsibility and control.They need to unite.)
As I said my theory that there will be eco economy and asset backed currencies,probably states will print and devalueate currencies to rig their depts,so only one thing what I can connect to eco economy and asset backed currencies is ,there must be hyperinflation and globalists will have of course solution for that.
Debts will be inflated and as solution will be asset backed currencies,dictated from IMF or Brics as solution and accpeted by masses,as right thing.Now I want to connect single world currency to this ,what make sense to me if there will be assets audit per country,which will value their currency to give it some real value, then connection to one world currency can work like this,country will have some value then world currecy will be evaluate by country exchange code when trade between countries is made.Everyone operating in one currency with different exchange rates.
written by ericbasillais , June 29, 2016
I acknowledged your good prdiction about brexitand sustain your analysis of the NWO plot?
Yet, there are two variables you do not put in the equation :
people now want freedom and independance no matter what economic result. It is called patriotism and as aarule most of them has already Nothing to lose, everything to win...
seond, Putin. there is a bad strategic game in europe that could trigger a nuclear war along wth the crash you truethfully forecast.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
@Eric
I disagree. People's minds change drastically when they don't know where their next meal will come from. There are some who will fight back, but they are already prepared for collapse. You need to think in terms of the way things will be tomorrow, not the way things are today.
I doubt nuclear war is in the cards. Putin is under the control of the elites and Russia's central bank is tied to the BIS. There is no need for nuclear war when the elites can simply starve half the world's population through currency crisis and debt default.
As stated in the article, I don't believe the elites will succeed. But if people think winning this fight will be as easy as voting on some referendums, they are sorely mistaken. This will become far uglier before it ever gets better and most people are not prepared in the slightest to weather the storm. The best possible action people can take right now is to store as many necessities as they can, become as self sufficient as possible, and be ready to physically fight for their freedom, because that is what it is going to take. Nothing less will do.
written by Islander , June 29, 2016
Brilliant ! I thought Trump was probably the next US president but for the wrong reasons, or more precisely, for reasons that are not sufficient by themselves. Hillary Clinton has too many problems, she’s hated (rightfully) by many americans, she has had some health problems, she is old and she is not an effective communicator especially compared to Donald Trump. You’re able to see right through the narrative (Sovereignty is the Villain) that they are beginning to develop and now for the first time we have a time table for the unfolding of the events. Many thanks!
written by Stephen's , June 29, 2016
As Rham Emmanuel once said, never let a good crisis go to waste. He should have finished the quote with, and we caused the crisis in the first place.
written by Frogdaddy , June 29, 2016
Where does Islam fit in all of this and/or controlled chaos? I think they'll ramp up the chaos. Starting with violence at the both party conventions. They want us all on edge and anxious. We're divided by race, gender, religion, rich/poor....etc.
Are the terrorist attacks lone wolves. I'm trying to figure why Islamists would attack Turkey which has become less secular and more Islamist. For supporting Isis? The chickens come home to roost? More anti-terror legislation means less freedom and movement?
The Fabians want to heat things up.
written by ericbasilllais , June 29, 2016
I read your answer and agree with you up to a point.
That may be because there is a slight cultural difference between old and new world, european minded and american minded.
Here we have roots to rely on. This is a factor of behaviour that gather people when they should otherwise fight on their own, for community purposes at best.
Therefore we are invaded by third world barbarous birds.
Yet, there is still a possibility to survive and rebuild, in the deepest France for example, a France that is never on the "universal" mainstream picture.
Unlike midwest we have a large network of villages aged since the beginning of Neolithic i. e. thousands of years.
there is no way to destroy that overnight by a market crisis.
They came across many world wars already, not to mention religion wars and other atrocities back in centuries ago.
that may sound odd but there is always roots, included from a religious point of view, not only catholicism but also Gaul, celtic beliefs.
An identity that a crash would not erase, all the contrary. Isolation would be a benediction for our peoples. We do not need any market to live on. Only cities will face the problems you point out. Not countryside.
What with the wwIII, I do agree also with you about BIS (BRI) head of the banking octopus. Therefore, an alliance between a brexit UK and China is NOT a bad move for the octopus as their central banks are sisters.
Yet, there is a strategic plan of Putin to take control over the banking system in RUSSIA. and it would comme along with other military affairs.
We just have to wait and see. But Russia is a real challenger and "traitor to NWO" as Jacob Rothschild put it.
And the war mongering here is NOT a fake.
So Your point of view is really precious and I follow your blog from France. But the market is a filter to some real important things that may change the game.
Roots, cultural patriotism, resistance to oppression, continental or world wars are part of our DNA and some are naturally prepared to face the consequences. Because, we come from the land, first of all. And what is true for post modern France and western Europe is even more true for eastern europe and Russian Siberia, which can survve any global atomic disaster.
written by Flemisch Guy , June 29, 2016
Brandon,
Nice article.
The elites came out in full force saying that England has to get out as soon as possible and their choice is irreversable. That crazy drunk Juncker refused to speak English (probably to enrage the Brits even more) and proposals are being made to give voting rights for Europe to 16 year olds, like you said: they know 99% of young people haven't got the life experience they need, especially this generation of snowflakes.
What are your thoughts on Farage? Is he a well meaning useful idiot or is he in on the game?
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
@Eric
There is no difference between the economic fundamentals of France or the U.S. or any other nation for that matter. Either you have a self reliant localized system, or you don't. Either you are prepared for economic crisis, or you are not. Towns and villages that are prepared MAY survive. However, if they are not ready to defend themselves, they can be ransacked by looters and governments, just as the Soviets did under Stalin. Assumption means death in this game.
Also, there is no conflict between the elites and Russia or the other BRICS. The BRICS work hand in hand with the IMF and the BIS. This is a fact. You are welcome to read my numerous articles on the false East/West paradigm. The "confrontation" between Russia and the West is pure theater.
written by Bonfire , June 29, 2016
Dead on. Thank you for articulating this manufactured chaos fully. Our biggest obstacle seems to be describing the big picture to the uninformed and clarifying the deception to the folks that should know better.
written by shutupnsing , June 29, 2016
1) Cameron "presented the prospect of a referendum" never believing for a second that the leavers had a chance of winning.
2) I thought I read Soros shorted the pound.
3) I know there are many in the military, law enforcement, medical and business community that never bargained for our "fundamental transformation" who are ready to stand with Trump...guys like Sheriff David Clarke.
4) Brexit's success, just like Trump's success, is more about the immigrant/Islamic hordes than the "Globalist's Win" theory concedes.
The trillion dollar question is ~ Do the big bad globalist elites have what it takes to take on a world that seems to have made up its mind to fight back?
written by Diane D , June 29, 2016
"The best possible action people can take right now is to store as many necessities as they can, become as self sufficient as possible, and be ready to physically fight for their freedom" AMEN!
I am an old coot who did exactly that for 6 years. I expected others in the so-called Liberty Movement to do the same. What a joke. They talk a good game but saying isn't doing. They buy and bunch of guns and a case of Mountain House and sit on their asses. No skill development, training, building defensible homes, practicing their plans and actually using their preps, building comradery, building communications networks like AmRRON. I bet less than 5% support Oath Keepers. Less than 1% came together in CPTeams. When chaos hits I guarantee you that most LM 'patriots' in my area will show up cold, tired and hungry at the door steps of 2 or 3 homes of those who truly prepared. They talk like ants but chaos will reveal them as classic grasshoppers.
In these 6 years our Constitution and Bill of Rights has been flushed down a rat hole without one shot fired. IF I am still alive, wake me up IF we ever implement Rule 308 and re-invoke the Declaration of Independence.
written by Gustav , June 29, 2016
It seems to me that in Europe and in the US the problem is perceived as caused by "globalization." The wildly popular Bernie Sanders just wrote a column about it in the NYT in the context of the Brexit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/opinion/campaign-stops/bernie-sanders-democrats-need-to-wake-up.html?_r=0
Likewise Trump. GATT and NAFTA are neoliberal treaties associated with "globalization." Trump apparently intends to to renegotiate NAFTA to "make America great again."
So how do the one-world bankers offer a global solution to a problem caused by "globalization?" Because those treaties are associated in the public's mind with "free trade" though they are anything but. So the crash will be caused by global "free trade" requiring a global communist solution. Perfect.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
@shutupnsing
1) Cameron does nothing without being told to first. Remember, he is a globalist puppet.
2) His advisers claim he was long on the pound. Though we'll probably never see proof on this.
3) I'm not so sure that's a good thing. Trump meets privately with CFR members, meets with Henry Kissinger, and also has no plans to shut down the Fed. I see no indication he is anti-establishment.
4)And who LET all those refugees come flooding into the EU? Yep, the Globalists. You don't think they knew this would cause a right wing backlash?
So far, no one is actually "fighting back". Not a single globalist has been removed from their seat of power. All we are doing so far is fighting each other, which is exactly what the elites want. Until I start seeing globalists being removed from the field, there is no fight against the globalists.
written by S.N.Strutt , June 29, 2016
GREAT ARTICLE
I totally agree with your conclusiions. "BREXIT":- THE GLOBALISTS versus NATIONALISTS
See my website on the BREXIT in detail.
I live here in the UK. The first LINK is an article that i wrote about the BREXIT months before it even happened & I explained at the time, why the BRITISH EU REFERENDUM VOTE on 23rd June would be RIGGED, one way or the other. and I also wrote about it after it happened. http://www.outofthebottomlesspit.co.uk/411713687
http://www.outofthebottomlesspit.co.uk/420615261
http://www.outofthebottomlesspit.co.uk/421014748
http://www.outofthebottomlesspit.co.uk/420816173
http://www.outofthebottomlesspit.co.uk/418645256
Please pass on all of the above information as it could help a lot of people to WAKE-UP and perhaps take action on behalf of their country.
Best Wishes, Steve (Author and writer)
written by justanobserver , June 29, 2016
Foxcatcher,
Bullshit!
Brandon does not delete all messages that challenge his analysis.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
Only the messages from our local village idiot, Chaban, who has been banned for trolling under numerous accounts. He was wrong on the Brexit vote and is now desperate to save face by claiming the recent no-volume rally (which I also predicted) means that he was somehow "right". It's rather pathetic.
written by Frank W. Hooper , June 29, 2016
Monday and Tuesday all over the conservative and liberty sites I saw headlines "The wicked Witch is dead" and the NWO sites playing the old line "whatever you do PLEASE don't throw me in that brier patch".
If it sounds too good to be true it probably is.
Due to failing health I wish You were completely wrong and I wouldn't have to endure the hardship I see coming but I don't think You are wrong. I've come to respect Your thoroughness and the fact that You don't seem to have any sacred cows that You won't send to the glue factory.
As for Trump, see line 5. I admit to being quite pleased with his the PC-SJW cult though.
written by justanobserver , June 29, 2016
Frank W. Hooper,
Wishing she was but the reptile Canklesaurus still makes dogs howl when it speaks and children cry when they see it.
written by Seen2013 , June 29, 2016
"Even if Trump is a legitimate anti-establishment conservative, his entry into the Oval Office will seal the deal on the economic collapse, and will serve the globalists well. The international banks need only pull the plug on any remaining life support to the existing market system and allow it to fully implode, all while blaming Trump and his conservative supporters."
Lets see here:
-Election ballots digitally catalog who voted what.
-Trump's Presidency presumably places Conservative Leaders into the DC area.
-Trump's Presidency will be blamed for the total economic collapse Globalists can point to as national sovereignty and nationalism (national identity by traditions and values like the US Constitution) are the cause and thus argue cause and effect outdated.
-Trump will be tempted by both Hawks and Doves as advocated by Rand Corp into war with BRICS namely Russia and China guaranteeing the utter destruction or otherwise 'New Babylon Project' of the United States.
Clearly, the Globalists knows the stages of Revolution or otherwise the Fourth Turning.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
"There is no need for nuclear war when the elites can simply starve half the world's population through currency crisis and debt default."
I have to disagree. If you follow several textbooks as Global Issues and Regional Geography, the recurring theme under critical study and openly discussed respectively is the relatively tranquil period after World War II has caused a rise of reversal against supranationalism commonly referred to as internationalism or globalism towards nationalism.
Now, if you follow the same processes of the economic decisions of central banks to per say nuclear disarmament, would it not lead you to believe the best way for the globalists to realize a 'nuclear free world' is thus utilizing a world war in which nuclear weapons are used by the same methodologies? I would think so.
First, it follows the author of The Grand Chessboard's assessment that it is easier to kill a million people than control them.
Second, it decimates the foundations of the Industrial Age that in Keynesian Economics spurs investment in more 'sustainable development' friendly manner that mirrors the 4 models of Future Dwelling Forum proposed to the United Nations one of which is the Venus Project.
Third, it guarantees for decades the finite, isolated, or otherwise simple system utilization of scientific law in which is only true in very precise, specific, or otherwise controlled circumstances. Man-made climate change is entirely based on this concept that is under the scientific disciplines nicknamed Tinker's Sciences. Kinda like when cars were much, much simpler.
Fourth, what remains of the opposition is no match for the implementation of the Earth Constitution advocated by organizations as this gem
http://worldparliament-gov.org/constitution/the-earth-constitution/
written by Decontextualized , June 29, 2016
Brilliant article as usual Brandon. I was thinking the other day after Bernie Sanders' "anti-globalism" piece that the establishment is making him out to be the Ron Paul of the youth collectivists, sewing the political seeds for the next election in 8 years.
The only one of your points I have reservations about is whether the next step is "a larger and more centralized global power structure" or balkanization. I would say the biggest prize the globalists could get out of the next crisis would be global currency, not global government.
According to Pawns in the Game (which John referred to above), point #3 of old man Rothchild's original 1773 plan was that money was now more powerful than governments. I.e. "the Power of Gold had usurped the power of Liberal rulers.... it is immaterial whether the established governments are destroyed by external or internal foes because the victor had to of necessity ask the aid of 'Capital' which 'Is entirely in our hands'." That strategy did indeed work to gain control in the British and other monarchies. England let the Colonies go politically, but used the same formula through central banking to get control of them again, bleeding the US economy into the Depression to help England maintain the Pound despite WWI debt. The most effective form of servitude today is still monetary.
The globalists seem to field alternate strategies, so I have no doubt that "a breakdown of the EU ... can be used as leverage for a larger and more centralized global power structure in the long term." However, another scenario is to use balkanization of the EU to push for globally controlled currency. After the EU breakup, the globalists would pretend that they have been defeated, just like they're pretending that "Brexit" was a defeat. They then foment tribalism and nationalism, using it implement protectionist tariffs (as all the Presidential candidates are pushing for) and currency wars. These can all be blamed on independence and sovereignty later if necessary. Balkanization also has other benefits, e.g. Texas seceding ("Texit") would make it impossible for the rest of the US ever again to have a non-collectivist president; the 49 states could then attack Texas.
After breakup, the monetary chaos of currency wars transfers even more money to the globalists, while frustrating the public to return to some sort of bullion standard. I'm suspicious that the controlled opposition's obsession with gold has been paving the way for this for years. Problem > Reaction > Gold! Of course, gold is superior to fiat "paper" currencies, because gold you hold cannot be taxed through inflation. However, governments and central banks had a history of manipulating the gold money supply before fiat currency became ubiquitous. This history has been rewritten in the controlled opposition media.
So, when the people clamor for stable money, perhaps a basket currency with gold (SDR) is offered. Failing acceptance of that, the globalists again pretend to be defeated. Then Russia or China "come to the rescue" by issuing bullion coins, completely destroying the dollar and passing control of the globalist financial system to the East. Silver coins and digital gold would be a very effective combination. It would maintain the illusion of sound money through silver for day to day purchases, while giving the globalists a digital ("gold") currency. Since silver is unwieldy for storing significant wealth, and bullion coins have inconveniences, over time most would shift to digital bullion. The apparent defeat of the globalists would lower people's guard, and a flawed bullion coin standard, e.g. without seigniorage, would also hasten the shift to digital money. Later, another confiscation of physical bullion is straightforward after a couple false flag terrorist attacks "paid for with gold/silver".
Part of the evil brilliance of the EU is that it psychologically conditions the association of two unrelated concepts: freedom of movement/work and a common centrally-controlled currency. 200 years before, Europe had the former without the latter. But as religion and state schools are used to condition the association of power with virtue, many Europeans now believe a single currency and/or relinquishing national sovereignty is necessary to enable certain freedoms "granted" by the EU.
With global digital currency implemented via government ID, global government is not really necessary. Dissidents on a secret global terror list can be controlled by shutting off their ID, and with it money, travel, and food. No black bag required. The "immigration" crises, and suspicious faked passports left at every "terrorist" event, could easily be used as justification to push for "more secure" biometric national ID. With Trumps statements, I could also see the USA swinging all the way from effectively no borders, to overt national ID "to establish who the real citizens are."
With global control of the money, globalists have control over the balkanized countries regardless. Eventually the individual governments could be combined, but it might be better to give the illusion of sovereignty. Either way it's game over. With every country disarmed, and no single country powerful enough to defeat the World Union, there are no more real threats, and the New Dark Ages descends.
What do you think?
written by stevenguinness , June 29, 2016
Brilliant article Brandon.
What are your thoughts on the expected delay for invoking article 50 of the Lisbon treaty? Cameron has said the new Conservative leader will be the one to invoke the article.
There's now just over a 2 month window until Britain has a new prime minister. Do you think it's possible that in that time enough stress could be placed on the UK economy for a further delay to ensue on article 50? Of course after September we are only weeks away from the US election.
Would be grateful for your thoughts. Thanks.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
@Seen
I'm going to have to stand by my view of nuclear war; it is far simpler to starve a million people with economic breakdown that it is to clean up after a nuclear conflagration. I don't really see the advantage to launching nukes.
That said, I DO see the advantage of having one or two go off and blaming "terrorism". The image of a mushroom cloud over an American city would be horrifying to the masses, making them easy to manipulate.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
@Steven
I would wait until after the 4th of July when most of the EU and central bank meetings start taking place before any conjecture on the Article 50 situation. Right now, everything is in a daze and there is no volume in markets. It will take a couple weeks before reality settles in and the future on the bureaucratic side can be discerned.
written by Donald Patrick Canaday , June 29, 2016
Brexit = " article 50 " legal document for England to leave EU". This legal document England signed with EU to legally leave.Also remember England kept sterling and British pound and gold sovereigns.
written by Useless Eater , June 29, 2016
Brandon, do you not realize that the more common sense a person shows, the less you are taken seriously? Take it from me, Useless Eater, I know...
I mean, I don't even read your articles anymore because it is usually exactly in line with my thinking. I didn't even read this one. I just happened to see this header on Steve Quayle's site:
"◾Brexit Aftermath - Here’s What Will Happen Next:The Brexit is part of a globalist long game that is designed to finally and completely demonize sovereignty movements.SQ-BREXIT WAS TOTALLY EXECUTED BY THE GLOBALISTS!"
I had a strong feeling that it was your article and I did not need to read it to know what it says - because I have common sense.
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
@Useless Eater
I think a lot of people have a gut feeling similar to what I discuss in my articles, and it helps them to see it in writing. In fact, most Alt-Market readers probably pick up on these connections just as quickly if not before I do.
I will admit though that working in the liberty movement, you get a lot of people trying to tear you down and marginalize you when you make solid calls. The closer to the target you are, the more flak you get. I'm impervious, but it makes me wonder how many good analysts have quit in the past because of the vipers hiding in the floorboards (or hiding behind their keyboards).
written by Useless Eater , June 29, 2016
You sell yourself short, Brandon. I will consider it a noble and humble reply, this one of yours, but if you really think people can see things as clearly as you - just show me one article that articulates it as well as you can - and as easily.
Just one.
Your advantage over the other so-called journalists, in my bloated opinion, is that you have an outside-looking-in viewpoint that takes into consideration most overlying factors. In other words, the reason it comes so easy to you is that you are cheating. You have the Teacher's Edition and everybody else was educated in government-run public schools.
Good day to you. I might read this article a bit later; maybe tomorrow (shrugs shoulders). Maybe...
written by Karsten , June 29, 2016
Like you said, more centralization is on its way, as i found this article (in german):
http://www.konjunktion.info/2016/06/eu-superstaat-deutschland-und-frankreich-schieben-einen-eu-integrationsplan-nach-dem-brexit-an-zufall-oder-kalkuel/
http://www.konjunktion.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Ein-starkes-Europa-in-einer-unsicheren-Welt.pdf
The Document: "Ein starkes Europa in einer unsicheren Welt"
(A strong Europe in an uncertain world)
from Jean Marc Ayrault and Frank Walter Steinmeier
This document has probably not just been written these days, but be planned long before the brexit. i hope you can find an english version of it somewhere in the net.
thanks Brandon for all your articles.
Karsten, Germany
written by T33AJ , June 29, 2016
Very interesting article.
Fitting into the Global Reset narrative Brexit is perfect to hasten the agenda. I believe that the goal of the Globalists is to set all major currencies at parity with the USD so when the reset comes it will be easier to implement. The EURO, Swiss Franc, Japanese Yen are all there already more or less but the stubbornly expensive Pound needed to be brought down. Brexit serves that purpose perfectly and it's more than possible that Brexit will lead to a substantial weakening of the British Pound and to it's ultimate demise.
written by j edgar proof-rock , June 29, 2016
a couple points
1.) I think brandon is 'different' cuz he clearly isn't hawking gold-dust, or selling something 'special', he clearly has passion, I think that +90% of the Urnalists whether it be ZH, or any other site or MSM, all all selling something.
2.) On mentioning Israel, when I was young I considered Israel to be a proxy toy of USSA-MIC, now that I'm older I see Israel as just another USSA. When I mentioned Israel in context of Brexit, I should have just said "Tel Aviv",
[ I believe elite want UK-London, Basel, Tel-Aviv to be 'offshore' banking havens. Brexit allows them to control EU-USSA wealth, but not elite wealth. ]
Brexit is/was well orchestrated. Leaders call them elite, or RICH, they have their base, it be Basel, City-of-London, NaYC, and Tel-Aviv, and Singapore, Shanghai, Hong-Kong.
I see Brexit as creating an Island for City-of-London such that Elite money can be out of the reach of EU. ( UK proper banking outside of EU confiscation. )
Some UK held island's will hold the wealth, nobody in the club wants all the GOLD held in Tel-Aviv, or especially USSA.
I concur there will be a NUKE, most likely in or near NYC, which is another BIG reason for elite not to keep tangible wealth there.
City-of-London too, IMHO the GOLD will probably be kept deep or far from the coming strikes. For that matter too, Tel-Aviv is not secure. Most of the real elite rich have private islands far from population centers.
Much of the World is sweet, so long as your far from USSA, EU, Africa, India, ... I think its best to just hold physical gold, learn the local language and wait this thing out.
The coming civil-war in USA will be MUCH WORSE than the prior, wide spread death. Only safe place to be is not to be there. I think its best to have a cache in the USSA, and wait it out, post civil-war with western FIAT being worthless I think the future USSA GOV will be castrated, which means that everything will once again go local and constitutional.
The game of man has never changed, limited resource. Beautiful women, good-food, and nice land. It's always been a minority, where majority is ugly, nasty, and arid. Men will always kill to steal another man's Gold, be that oil, opium, any tangible form of wealth that allows men to enslave the world.
The Asian just wants to live, the west are just ran like cattle, with robots and AI now, there is no need for humans in the west be that USSA or EU.
EU USSA will become prisons, in time they will be walled contained and diseased. The fact that they're dumping immigrants shows they want to maximize the coming death's in the culling.
Brexit allows the UK to quit taking immigrants, which menas that UK real-estate will explode in value as rich EU people seek sanctuary.
Elysium is here today, and it is UK & Israel in the West.
Of course its far better to be in the East, as all the West will be controlled by high-tech fascism for years to come. Until western FIAT collapses, but that could be generations.
written by Newsboy , June 29, 2016
I just became aware of the rules change after March 31, 2017, but Angela Merkel may have been alerted before she made her comments about "allowing adequate time". Many of those now wanting to allow adequate time may know that triggering Article 50 after 3/31/17 involves approval by a majority of EU states.
https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2016/06/29/fact-if-the-uk-doesnt-have-a-signed-deal-by-april-2017-brexit-is-in-grave-danger/
https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2016/06/29/brexitmarch-2017-stitch-up-rebutting-the-charge-of-nonsense-about-earlier-slogpost/
written by Brandon Smith , June 29, 2016
@Newsboy
I think the psychology of the event will do the damage necessary long before the actual Brexit is implemented. Though some are calling for a fast-track initiative.
written by tsuyu , June 29, 2016
Good work Brandon. Someone has even translated a section of your article into japanese.
http://blog.livedoor.jp/wisdomkeeper/archives/51988743.html
(From: The Federal Reserve’s Janet Yellen ~~ to: the next step towards a single global central bank and a single global currency system.)
written by CALIFORNIA , June 29, 2016
This article is over at Zero Hedge posted after you posted your article. Nice call.
written by Rien , June 30, 2016
Does yore theory include the growing resentment against the social justice warriors?
I think that society as a whole is turning and we are (finally) getting away from politically correct posturing.
This could be in part responsible for a.o. a brexit and trump election. Even without global elites pulling ropes.
Does your theory include or allow for such a trend?
I ask this because it seems to me that the suggestion of "demonstrating how bad sovereignty is" is at least in part dependent on the viewpoints of the SJWs.
written by Brandon Smith , June 30, 2016
@Rien
Check out my article 'The Reasons Why People Hate Cultural Marxists' here:
http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2836-the-reasons-why-people-hate-cultural-marxists
The SJW movement is fundamentally a communist movement. The elites are using ignorant mobs of SJW's as a cattle prod to elicit anger in the right wing to the point that we swing to the other extreme - fascism. They used the same tactic in Europe preceding WWII. The rise in fascism in Europe in the 1930's was a direct response to manufactured communist agitators. People got sick of them, and unfortunately, became just as bad as them.
written by shutupnsing , June 30, 2016
"The collapse of our culture, the abortion, the ascendancy of sexual perversion, the collapse of the Rule of Law – all of these things are DERIVATIVE of the destruction of the Liturgy, a destruction that we sat, wallowing in our collective effeminacy, and watched." ~ Miss B http://www.barnhardt.biz/2016/...ntipapacy/
written by Decontextualized , June 30, 2016
@j edgar proof-rock
I've been thinking about this too, about what will be the "islands" of safety used to carry through the globalists and their minions' liquid wealth when the currencies collapse. It's too impractical for all the Elites to be totally in physical bullion. I would think they'll want some kind of cash around to quickly buy everyone else's assets for pennies on the dollar.
I'm thinking there may be a couple resilient, obscure fiat currencies that pull through reasonably well. Perhaps the CHF. The bankers are there a lot on their "Basel weekends", it's an exclusive club with very high minimums to get a bank account, it's off the radar of most of us useless eaters, and Switzerland has a long history of neutrality and independence in the face of chaos.
written by ericbasillais , June 30, 2016
I am aware of your position about fake hegelian ways. And I still bear it in mind... just in case...
Fortunately, if it is right that countryside could be looted , the barbarous do not know HOW to survive there in the long term. So they will be decimated, one way or another.
I see many dead also in the dramatic process.
But just I have good reasons to see a few remainers survive and rebuild.
The first strike strategy of USA near russian borders may trigger a russian first strike BEFORE aegis shield is completed. If it not hegelian theater you may heard of it very soon.
Eric
written by Spirit , June 30, 2016
Hello Brandon,
Many thanks for the information.
Can you please provide the best time frame to buy precious metals in this long game on play by elites?
I believe we will see serious deflation & world-wide unemployment ahead before 2020. Won't the prices of Gold & silver tumble down than the current ones?
Regards
written by Marshal Scot of "KANSAS" , June 30, 2016
The closest to total centralization (It'll never be completed. Iron mixed with clay, remember?), uh,.....how 'bout 6 years? Any guesses?
written by Brandon Smith , June 30, 2016
@Spirit
The best time to buy precious metals? Probably three months ago, but now is not a bad time either. If you are waiting for a significant drop, then I can't really help you there. When the Brexit vote initially hit equities tumbled but metals soared. The thing is, investors are now turning to metals as a safe haven for a deflationary crisis as much as they are using them as a hedge against inflation. If the situation ultimately turns out the way I predict (a stagflationary crisis), then metals are the best investment either way.
If you buy and they drop, then buy some more and hold onto the rest. They're going to skyrocket in value eventually, so all you have to do is buy and hold.
Regards,
Brandon Smith
written by Brandon Smith , June 30, 2016
@Marshal
Not a prophet, but the Rothschild owned magazine 'The Economist' called for a global currency (or at least the beginnings of one), by 2018. Which means the central bankers will have to do a LOT of centralizing in the next two years if that is their deadline.
If you don't have a prophet handy, the next best thing is to look at the plans the elites admit to in their own publications.
written by BRF , July 02, 2016
Very insightful. While I still believe the "Leave" vote was not orchestrated and caught the Apex Elites a little off guard I also believe they were quite prepared for whichever way the voting went. I would also add that many center-left folks view Globalism as a neo Fascist Feudal system that is being implemented under Globalism rather than the Fabian -Communist system that those more to the right view it as. This dichotomy of viewpoints is also an interesting point for exploration and could lead to a break through in analysis. The point I took away which is very strong is the those running the show will have to make good on the dire consequences they predicted will occur with a pro Leave vote even though it is all economic and trade hog wash. We must remember, left and right, when the crisis fully unfolds, or hits, who is to blame and not be panicked in a reaction and solution model. If we do not stick together we will be easily played off one against the other and must prepare our own solution now and put forward for public comment so as to be ready for its implementation rather than sit back and accept a Plan A or B as proposals by the Globalists, as akin to voting Democrat or Republican
written by BRF , July 02, 2016
Rather than rewrite two very sensible analyses on this title I'll link to an article and video on these two points in the title.
http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2016/06/27/what-next-after-brexit/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIaXVntqlUE
written by olde reb , July 02, 2016
I agree with your basic premise: No matter what happens, the shadow government will spin it to their advantage.
The striking similarity between the EU authoritative faceless unelected financiers and corporate controllers that have devastated the European group and the projected structure being promoted by secretive treaty negotiations involving the United States should be obvious. The beneficiaries of treaties and the EU are the corporations assembled into the CFR by Wall Street to eliminate competitors. Six super conglomerate corporations now control 90% of all commerce ?
The embezzling of money by Wall Street/ Federal Reserve for the TBTF banks, and the same scheme by the ECB with the Euro, provides humongous funds for the above perfidious acts. It is such a shame the simple con job used so many times (to delude the masses) by the Rothschild family has been so successful. No body ever catches on even when all features are in public sight. Ref. https://www.scribd.com/doc/115919607/FUNDING-THE-NEW-WORLD-ORDER
It was Wall Street that helped Allen Dulles create the CIA. Ref. DEVIL'S CHESSBOARD by David Talbot. Wall Street has been the overwhelming driver of CIA programs. Ref. CONFESSIONS OF ECONOMIC HIT MAN by John Perkins. Perkins and Michel Chossudovsky in GLOBALIZATION OF POVERTY detail how nations are impoverished for the benefit of Wall Street. Fletcher Prouty has given much insight as to how Wall Street uses the U.S. military to punish resistance to domination.
The CIA, using the strategy developed by Kermit Roosevelt in Iran in 1953, has armed and funded terrorists to overthrow any nation that resisted Wall Street domination. They are the source of terrorist actions and all of the military false flag conflicts of today.
If the primary source of their funds, from the embezzlement by the Federal Reserve and from the Euro, is not exposed and interrupted, the impoverishment of the world will continue.
written by Web Surfer , July 03, 2016
Great piece. Focusing on Trump and Brexit/sovereign nations... agreed. Trump will swing it to fascism ultimately. The Caucasian will have the final nail driven as an evil people.
America's sovereign status and the UK's will be the fascist monster in the eyes of the world as the global media projects this image upon the masses; especially after all of the deportations.
It will be a war against world wide global "openness" versus evil xenophobes who simply want their homeland back.
VISIT - www.wartornnations.net
A chronology of globalist, "progressive", neocon machinations. The rabbit hole is a repetitive and predictable circle.
written by ERICBASILLAIS , July 05, 2016
Nothing to add on the plan of ideas.
yet, I belong to a frexit party in France and I would like to share a clip realised by a young militant of UPR (union populaire républicaine), a noright-left party dedicated to France leaving UE back to independance, borders, money state-made policy (no central bank, return to FRANC unit), developement of military forces, including people ruling through elected government AND a swiss-like process of referendums. There are also militants from other countries activing for the same goal (of which Greece).
/www.facebook.com/leaveeuofficial/videos/974597272638514/
and in french : UPR site :
//www.upr.fr
ERIC BASILLAIS
written by ERICBASILLAIS , July 05, 2016
In Italy, there is a view similar to Brandon's
It says that Brexit could fragilise UE AND THEN justify NATO reinforcement and an urge for more centralisation behind which atlantic council , NATO ( enlarged to Isarael, and emirates) ans economically throught TTIP / TAFTA "free-trade" ( meaning colonization) treaties.
UK would serve as a link between NATO block and Thalassocratic "commonwealth " empire .
There would be an hegelian scenario with the responding progress of SCO/OTSC, eurasian club.
I hope it is usefull to Americans...
We all lose our substance in the process...
ERIC BASILLAIS
written by wholy1 , July 06, 2016
cui bono
test access
offer consent
written by james carmarthen , September 28, 2016
Yes, the media is all controlled and trying to paint freedom fighters as “terrorist/subversives/hate groups etc” to dull the public into allow the new world order to happen, which is global leftist slavery. However, it is US that is allowing for it. Stop buying into the media propaganda. Vote the right choice knowing that they will crash the system in retaliation, but FIGHT BACK to rebuild the economy, this time in a non-corrupt and non-leftist manner. I voted brexit. I knew full well they’d retaliate. I knew full well Id be framed as a “racist xenophobe that wants to destroy the economy”, but I never bought into it and know in the long run, if people enforce their sorevingty, that it was the best decision for future generations. Because I do not want to live in or pass on a nazi controlled planet.
written by Curious , November 16, 2016
Brandon, you mentioned that confrontation between Russia and the West is a "pure theater". You also mentioned that Putin is controlled by elite. What are the facts that make you think that way?
written by Brandon Smith , November 22, 2016
@Curious
Google "Alt-Market, false East/West paradigm". You will find several articles sourced with evidence that show Putin works closely with globalists at the IMF and BIS. He openly calls for the IMF to institute a global currency system under the SDR.
