I have said it many times in the past — when elitist criminals start openly admitting to their schemes it means that they are ready to pull the plug on the current system. They simply don’t care anymore who knows their plans because they think that victory is inevitable.
There have been more subtle and less prominently published calls for a "new world order" in the past, to be sure. However, at no other time have I seen international financiers and their puppet political mouthpieces so brazen about calling for global centralization than in the wake of the successful Brexit referendum. It is as if the Brexit flipped a switch in the existing narrative and set loose a flood of new propaganda, all aimed at convincing the general public that central banks must combine forces and act as one institution in order to combat an economic crisis that isn’t even visible to laymen yet.
Though I predicted the activation of this propaganda campaign in my article “Brexit: Global Trigger Event, Fake Out Or Something Else?,” published before the referendum vote took place, the speed at which it is developing is truly astonishing.
Now, under the current circumstances of the previous week’s market rally post-Brexit (driven by hopes of central bank intervention and extremely low trading volume) one would think that the globalist calls for total centralization of financial policy management don't make much sense. Where is this “crisis” that the bankers keep warning about?
As I outlined in great detail in recent articles, I believe the Brexit to be a partial trigger event for a future market disaster that has been engineered for many years. That is to say, a worldwide financial calamity has been deliberately staged in advance, and the Brexit is meant to act as a scapegoat for it. The fundamentals of the global economy have been increasingly negative since 2008, and the only "indicator" left to appear positive has been stocks.
There are plenty of people out there who assume that equities have escaped without consequence after the UK referendum because of the pre-4th of July rally. However, I would suggest they not get too comfortable with the hollow low volume spike in stocks at this early stage.
These kinds of rallies should not be a surprise. They were common during the derivatives and credit crash that struck in 2008 after Bear Sterns and Lehman. Ultimately, stocks are an irrelevant faith driven indicator, and the fundamentals will always win in the end.
As Forbes notes in a surprisingly honest analysis — the “Lehman moment” of 2008 was not really a “moment” at all. The derivatives crash was driven by numerous frailties within the debt bubble structure; Lehman was just a higher profile element of a more chaotic mess. When Lehman’s bankruptcy went public, equities took a considerable dive, rather similar in velocity to that which occurred right after the Brexit referendum. But, only a week later stocks had rallied back near the exact highs seen before Lehman had folded.
The psychology of market investors is to always first go with what they are familiar with and what they have been conditioned to do, much like Pavlovian dogs. Investors today, as then, were conditioned to “buy the dip no matter what”. Of course, once reality and the fundamentals set in, stocks were back in free-fall only two weeks later.
The Brexit is not going away, and the negative effects it heralds are still barely visible to the mainstream. This process is going to be actively weighing on the markets for months as investors continue to lose their blind faith in the system. We haven’t even begun the party yet, and this is assuming there are no other catalyzing moments around the corner.
Beyond the mechanics of the economy, the elites themselves are often a good litmus test for predicting what is about to take place within the stock casino and outside the stock casino.
The fact that the mainstream financial media is now awash in calls for extreme measures in central bank coordination and numerous elites warning of greater crisis should be of some concern to the public. Just as the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned of a crash back in 2007 and early 2008 and were proven “correct,” they have also been warning of a crash in 2016. Post-Brexit, the chorus of “warnings” from the elites has exploded. They are rarely wrong about economic crisis exactly because they are the people that create the conditions for crisis in the first place.
George Soros continues to claim that the Brexit has “accelerated a financial-market crisis” even after the latest stock rally.
Bloomberg, in support of European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, published an article titled “Draghi Wishes For A New World Order Populists Will Love To Hate.” Bloomberg later removed the word “New” from the title.
The article repeats a rising call by central bankers around the world to stop concerning themselves with “domestic” policies and problems and start coordinating globally to deal with “global problems.” The BIS ALREADY controls the policy making decisions of all other central banks as admitted in the infamous Harpers expose on the BIS titled “Ruling The World Of Money.” But this is never mentioned by Draghi or Bloomberg.
Interestingly, the BIS is now arguing not only for global policy coordination, but also GLOBAL RULES for all central banks. If the BIS already controls the policy decisions of the Federal Reserve, the ECB, and every other central bank member, then why do they want “global rules” put in place for those same central banks?
They are doing this because the goal, the end game, is for the general masses to accept and even demand a global central bank, either in the form of the BIS or the IMF, or perhaps both of them combined into a single entity. Once again, the elites are using the Hegelian problem-reaction-solution strategy to manipulate the public into wanting globalist control.
The BIS has been building up to this moment for quite some time. In May, for example, BIS chief economist Claudio Borio argued that a "new global monetary order" was needed to replace the dollar system. This new system would prevent crisis by reigning in all national central banks under rules which would force them to act in a coordinated fashion, apparently under the administration of the BIS itself. Now it would seem the central bankers have the beginnings of their "crisis" which they clearly plan to put to good use.
In yet another recent article Bloomberg calls for central banks to “kiss their domestic bias goodbye”; arguing that national economies are now so “intertwined” that central banks all need to work off a single set of guidelines in support of the global economy rather than individual national economies.
On the day after the Brexit vote, China stated its desire for the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to work closely with World Bank. For years I have been pointing out that the Chinese never had any intention for the AIIB to become a counter-system to the IMF or World Bank and that the Chinese were working with the globalists, not against them. Now we have open confirmation.
The Chinese premier also warned of a “butterfly effect” leading to crisis after the Brexit, and called for “enhanced coordination” among all the economies of the world.
European Union officials are going for broke as they suggest the formation of a European “super state” in the wake of the UK referendum. This system would essentially erase political boundaries and sovereign borders to make the EU a single entity in every capacity up to and including a single European army.
The amplified calls for total centralization and a “New World Order” go on and on, and I believe they are a blaring signal that something very ugly is about to happen.
Consider this: Central banks will never gain public support for globally centralized policy or a global economic authority unless they are proven right and a crash does indeed take place. The crash does not necessarily need to be immediate and “total”, as some liberty movement activists assume. It is more likely to be gradual and micromanaged, though still resulting in a level of suffering in certain regions not seen since the Great Depression.
More bank coordination requires more chaos and examples of “conflicting policies,” which will probably take the form of “currency wars” among certain nations. The elites must conjure a theater in which some central banks work at cross purposes and muck up any potential recovery. They can then argue to the public that a single internationally recognized and obeyed global banking authority is needed to prevent this sort of thing from ever happening again.
The concept of central banks “working globally” rather than domestically could only be sold to the masses if a fiscal disaster was triggered on a global scale that outmatched the needs of any single nation state. Each central banker initiative suggested after the Brexit requires a financial implosion in order to be justified.
In my next article I will be listing the many reasons why I believe the globalist plan for centralization and a NWO is destined to fail. This does not mean, though, that extensive effort and sacrifice will not be necessary in the near future on our part. For now, vigilance is our best defense. The elites are telling us exactly what is about to happen through their very behavior and statements. It is time for those who are aware of the bigger picture to start listening if they are not already, and prepare accordingly.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by ouch , July 06, 2016
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
written by Lookout below , July 06, 2016
I've felt we are close a few times over the last few years, but this time I'm sure. And isn't it melting down quick. The difference is (as you say) this time all the talk from the leaders is very negative. Most people I know can feel the negative energy right now is at boiling point, though few see the economic carnage ahead. TPTB will do something really soon, UK is looking really bad, but these Italian banks have to turn into a crisis, this bail-in or bail-out seems to be the angle to me. More resentment towards the EU. Also any day the negative chatter about greece not paying their debt will start.
written by Forearmed , July 06, 2016
Badges? Badges? We don't need no stinking badges.
Demanding? Oh really? They can go "F" themselves.
I would be honored to be the one with the lone bullet in a firing squad, aiming squarely between their eyes.
We are sick and tired of bullies regardless of what station in life they inhabit. If someone bullies you, then take them out. Bullies will soon get the message, that bullying is not acceptable when they start dying is numbers.
written by Flemisch Guy , July 06, 2016
Brandon,
Thanks for the article.
Would you put money in long term put futures on indexes?
thx
written by Sold-Out , July 06, 2016
@Just Me
COMPARE...
"17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."
With Woodrow Wilson's words in "The Newfound Freedom" (1913):
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the
biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of
somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so
subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak
above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it....
They know that America is not a place of which it can be said, as it used to be, that a man may
choose his own calling and pursue it just as far as his abilities enable him to pursue it; because
to-day, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that
will prevent his building up a business which they do not want to have built up; organizations
that will see to it that the ground is cut from under him and the markets shut against him. For if
he begins to sell to certain retail dealers, to any retail dealers, the monopoly will refuse to sell to
those dealers, and those dealers, afraid, will not buy the new man's wares." ---
"No man might buy or sell "
written by Sold-Out , July 06, 2016
Ooops...
Correction
Wilson's Book...
"The New Freedom".... not "Newfound Freedom"...
written by Pologrounds , July 06, 2016
Good article. Things are really starting to move now. We'll see what strife awaits Europe in the coming months. I expect them to try to create some new stability boards of some sort, start to work out deals to reduce sovereign debt amounts as opposed to exits, and veer towards a return to national currencies. Might be a Fall of referendums.
The U.S.? Autumn 2008 x2. Just in time for Teflon Hillary.
written by Frank W. Hooper , July 06, 2016
At the end of the 7 lean years the Egyptians demanded that Pharaoh take them as slaves for some food.
Here in the U.S. we have been systematically stripped of anything resembling savings or equity that has not been rendered inaccessible when "They" crash the system. Tangibles of value not hidden where they can be protected will be taken and sadly a large majority will clamor for slavery for a few days food.
written by Ron T Coon , July 06, 2016
...to bring charges to banksters, multi-national corporations, and politicians, whom have done anything to subvert the constitution of this republic. Charges of treason, sedition which would lead to incarceration, death and confiscation of sale of all of their worldly assets.
written by Brandon Smith , July 06, 2016
@Flemisch Guy
I'm not a personal financial adviser, but I am continuing to stack precious metals. I do not recommend playing the markets.
written by Distant Stu , July 06, 2016
Interesting analysis, I think that your point about a gradual and staged/micromanaged crash ties in well with the fact that the Brexit doesn’t actually occur for 2 years after the Article 50 request is made to the EU, and I don’t believe that the request has been formally made as yet. The vote was merely the decision to head into this 2 year exit process. So there is ample time to manage the public perceptions and design a collapse.
I look forward to reading your views on why the plans of the Elites will fail. Hopefully you can cover their reactions once they lose positive control of the situation as I am certain they will not take failure well.
Out of curiosity, do you hold a view on the work of Strauss-Howe and their generational theory? There are some interesting coincidences between current events and their projections.
Cheers
written by Scyale , July 06, 2016
Was Between Two Ages some sort of literary equivalent to Hitler’s Mien Kampf in which he laid out the elites’ plans in terms so clear that nobody would believe them?
Whatever the case, Brzezinski envisioned the “ultimate solution” in his carefully defined “Technetronic Era.”
What is the “Technetronic Era”? Plain and simple, it is a vision rooted in historic Technocracy from the 1930s. It is also the resurrection of feudalism with many new twists thanks to advanced technology. Thus, the term neofeudalism fits Technocracy or Technetronic perfectly: A few own all the resources and then tell everyone else what they can or can’t do on planet earth.
In 1938, The Technocrat magazine defined Technocracy as follows:
“Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population… “
This is exactly what is happening today: social engineers working with global corporations to take over the entire economic and social landscape.
Thus, society is being ‘scientifically’ reengineered to serve the corporate lords. The old-fashioned terms of ‘supply’ and ‘demand’ don’t apply any more. Consumer demand is artificially manipulated to soak up whatever global corporations decide they want to manufacture.
In other words, Technocracy is a complete takeover of both the means of production and consumption, a feat never before attempted nor achieved in the history of the world.
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/07/06/whence-technocracy-neofeudalism-peasants-pitchforks/
written by ericbasillais , July 07, 2016
Among globalists, the chief of India central bank (Rajan) also insisted on a world monetary policy (i. e. World empire state).
written by hi , July 07, 2016
Blame? It is the reason their currency went down in value. Also, and I don't live in the UK, so I may be out of line for even commenting, but I was for Brexit because I thought that meant they could control the immigration crisis. Well, Brexit isn't going to hep with the immigration crisis at all. Now, Scotland wants to break away from England and England is going to be a tiny island all alone with major money problems. I understand that the older generation who is still alive that fought in WWII wanted to leave the EU, but did they vote Leave for their own ego and sense of possession with out thinking how hard it will be for the younger generation to get the country back on it's feet? IDK
written by Brandon Smith , July 07, 2016
@hi
The young voted for Brexit too - over 27% under the age of 24. Over 38% under the age of 35. The argument that it was about "older" generations screwing over the young is simply nonsense.
They were right to support the referendum. The EU is a failure in every way. Problem is, the EU's failure is being exploited to build an even more centralized superstate, and the Brexit is being used as a scapegoat for all the economic problems that were already present in the union for years. This has nothing to do with the UK being isolated - this is about those in the UK who wanted to be free being BLAMED for all the fiscal problems the globalists have caused.
written by Grams ~ , July 07, 2016
Excellent article!
You could not help but get his message here: The U.S. president, who had openly sided with British Prime Minister David Cameron against Brexit, said the leaders of G20 nations, who will meet in China this year, will have to work to boost global demand and fortify the global economy.
Anxiously awaiting your next article, you have given me a glimmer of hope.
@ Badges? I have been bullied in my own home.
Sick and Tired !
written by JSmith , July 07, 2016
Things are progressing on schedule, as predicted by Rothschild's "Economist" 30 years ago:
http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2403-the-economic-end-game-explained
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences... The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations.."
-- Prof. Carroll Quigley, "Tragedy and Hope", 1966, pg 324
http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm
written by olde reb , July 08, 2016
A similar article on details of the New World Order perfidy is posted at https://www.scribd.com/doc/115919607/FUNDING-THE-NEW-WORLD-ORDER.
It is alleged funding for the NWO comes from embezzlement by the Federal Reserve using the auction accounts money exclusively handled by the FRBNY. Ref. http://www.scribd.com/doc/4819...e-revised.
written by olde reb , July 08, 2016
The evidence that the Federal Reserve is embezzling $6 billion daily in the cited article is in plain sight for those who wish to see it.
ONE: The FRBNY will only establish a line of (fiat) credit for the government to spend (book entry money when they receive a Treasury security in the amount of the LOC.
TWO: The security is sold (as a small percentage on a roll-over security) and the FRBNY handles all of the accounts and disbursements. Ref. 31 CFR 375.3. The accounts are client accounts (not operational accounts) and have never been audited.
THREE: Funds from auctioning the deficit security issues (currently $2 trillion annually, $6 billion daily) cannot go to the government. If they did, they would have to buy the securities just issued since no other securities have been purchased. Under those circumstances, there would be no increase in the money in circulation (inflation) nor would there be any increase in the national debt. The money from the auction must go somewhere but it does not go to the government.
FOUR: The only feasible destination for the funds is to members of the Primary Dealers who are tasked with collecting called and redeemed Treasury securities. As hidden owners of the corporate Board of Governors (privately owned corporations are not required to file records with the SEC), they can receive deficit spending profit along with funds for the roll-over security work. The owners have put up no consideration for receiving $6 billion daily.
FIVE: Profit of the Federal Reserve legally belongs to the government.
It is assumed the same profitable scam has been set up with the Euro with each nation pledging to guarantee payment on the securities sold by the ECB. The money from the sale of the securities is theorized, based upon the Federal Reserve documented scheme, to go to the controllers of the ECB..
written by richie , July 09, 2016
so brandon, we are now only a handful of points from making new highs in the s&p 500.
it seems that there is an effort by the dark hand of central banks to 'dismantle' any 'risk off' behavior from the propaganda indexes as they 'respond' to "risk" created by the central banks themselves. eg. brexit.
why? this is hardly 'incrementally' increasing risk, and dropping the indexes.
what am i missing here?
written by Brandon Smith , July 09, 2016
@Richie
And only a few days ago the Dow was down a thousand points. The short term Dow is irrelevant and if you are looking at this with an attention span of only a few days, you will miss the bigger trend.
As I predicted they would in my Brexit post analysis article, the central banks stepped in to slow the initial effects of the Brexit, but they are very much still there. And when markets begin to drop exponentially in the next three weeks, people will be blaming the Brexit yet again. After Lehman collapsed, markets dropped and then experienced a historic rally only a week later. Two weeks after that the whole system began imploding.
Come back in a few weeks and then ask me what you are missing. And have patience - permanent shifts in the markets do not happen overnight. Some of the biggest rallies of all time happened during the Great Depression.
written by ericbasillais , July 09, 2016
I would like to get American fellas that BREXIT has created here a situation of political chaos I NEVER SAW in 50 years.
Any political mainstream party, in any occupied country, is now under severe internal crisis and will probably split.
Mediatic "intellectual" or "people" counter-attacks have all failed and been "striked" away by improbable objective alliances of communists and nationalists.
It is a real delicious moment UK has offered us...
So, yes, if not for other trigger event linked to the russian tensions, there is a mess to play on in this part of the empire-non-state-yet-and-may-be-never...
From laughing France with my bests wishes for american conséquences ( for there will necesserarily be some)
written by 20!13 , July 10, 2016
HEAR YEE - HEAR YEE Y0U CAN GET Y0UR 666 MiCR0CHiP IMPLANT N0W SEE YOU 0N JUDGEMENT DAY 0R HAS IT ALREADY STARTED !
written by Visitor , July 14, 2016
Another excellent article Brandon. You always teach so much. I confess that I am confused. I read here and there, statements that seem to warn that dark days of a collapse will soon fall on us like a lead weight. I have tried to make decisions to be prepared as best that I can, and now I have a particular need for new transportation, but I'm concerned about going into debt...and I'm only talking about $5,000. I know you aren't a crystal ball, but could you address this for me? Should I go into debt, and if I do, what sort of situation could I expect to see if a big crash hits the US?
written by Johnny Walker , July 17, 2016
When the G string 20 got together in 2008 after the last banking crisis they said they wanted a new monetary system...believe it or not they are more afraid of the masses than some think. But they hope the masses will kill each other off before they can get to them fighting over the crumbs.
In 1977 or so I set across the table from Ken Fromm with my father in-law at a dinner table. He had sold some pipe to Atlantica Richfield to run across the the state of Alaska. Some time after that we were going fishing and he was supper quite in deep thought, then he burst out those son's of bitches are going to change America, they're going to change the way we live. What you speak of here has been going on now for some time and the one who are more dependant on them are going to be the ones who fall the hardest. Their zitgist world is going to reach up and bite them in their collective asses.
2Thess and the shall that Wicked one be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the Spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming; even whose coming is after the working of Satan with all signs and lying wonders.
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
And for this cause shall God send them a strong delusion, that they should believe a lie...such is this country along with those who seek the power of the minds of men to use them for their sorted gain.
Brandon my take on Revelations is far from those who sit in the pretrib pews.
