The Department Of Homeland Security is the very epitome of unnecessary bureaucracy. Its formation was predicated on the existence of terrorist threats, many of which the U.S. government and orbiting alphabet agencies either created through acts of war, or fabricated out of thin air. Its policies of centralization were sold to the public as necessary to prevent systemic “miscommunications” that never actually took place. Throughout our history, it has been a rare occasion indeed when an attack falls upon American infrastructure or interests that was not influenced, directly or indirectly, by the actions of agencies which were supposedly employed to prevent such events from ever occurring. Whether through ‘blowback’, or through ‘false flag’, frankly, most of the harm that comes to our nation is perpetrated by the guiding hand of our inexorably corrupt government.
Knowing that the DHS was established on false pretenses forces us to question the agency’s true intentions, especially when a professional fear-monger like Secretary Janet Napolitano announces that the globalization of the world economy falls within her jurisdiction:
http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/01/27/the-urgent-need-to-protect-the-global-supply-chain/
Average citizens would assume that the DHS is a U.S.-centric institution, and regardless of its Orwellian behavior, is at the very least a distinctly American brand of tyranny. However, under encroaching strategies enforced since 2006 through the National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP), it is becoming very apparent that the Department Of Homeland Security is quickly taking on an “all-of-nation” role, most prominently in the defense of globalization:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/NIPP_Plan.pdf
In her most recent op-ed / propaganda piece published by Reuters, Napolitano makes it clear that the business of the DHS is lately focused on what she calls “global supply chain security”. This by itself could be seen as a perfectly logical extension of the DHS mandate to protect America. Unfortunately, the situation is not that simple. A few talking points and guidelines within the NIPP platform are rather disturbing, and create an open door for the internationalization of the DHS.
Ironically, Napolitano sets the stage first by pointing out the brittle nature of globalization, along with its numerous vulnerabilities:
“A vulnerability or gap in any part of the world has the ability to affect the flow of goods and people thousands of miles away. For instance, just three days after the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear tragedies struck Japan last March, U.S. automakers began cutting shifts and idling some plants at home. In the days that followed, they did the same at their factories in more than 10 countries around the world…”
As I have pointed out many times in the past, the utter lack of redundancy within our globalized system makes it the most impractical and downright destructive economic model in history. Janet Napolitano seems to agree at least in part on this point. The problem is that the weaknesses of globalization are not a mistake; they are a deliberate and useful tool for further centralization of once sovereign economies. Instead of addressing the obvious concern that globalization does not work, Napolitano, like every other globalist in our government, claims that it must be propped up at all costs for the “greater good”:
“Because protecting the global supply chain is inherently an international challenge, it will take an international effort to meet it. The tremendous benefits we all reap from an interdependent global economy means that we are all stakeholders in the security of that system…”
“…we will continue to think globally, enhancing our coordination with the international community and international stakeholders who have key supply chain roles and responsibilities. We will seek to develop and implement global standards, strengthen detection, interdiction, and information-sharing capabilities, and promote end-to-end supply chain security efforts with the international community.”
What “benefits” are we “reaping” from globalization? I haven’t the foggiest idea. The internationalization of banking and finance has led to the creation and subsequent implosion of the world’s largest debt bubble and further devaluation of many of the world's currencies. Centralized and corporatized food production has led to a complete lack of self reliance within our society, contributed to food scarcity, not abundance, and opened our means of sustenance to the mad-science and genetic criminality of monstrous entities like Monsanto. The globalization of law through treaty has supplanted the U.S. Constitution, fed the growth of unaccountable and unelected councils and committees, and stricken our country with policy initiatives that weren’t even written by officials that live here. There are absolutely no substantial benefits to globalization that outweigh its considerable detriments, unless, of course, you are one of the elite few who stand at the helm of the machine.
At the Davos Economic Summit which took place in the final week of January, Napolitano announced a program called the “National Strategy For Global Supply Chain Security”:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/national_strategy_for_global_supply_chain_security.pdf
Within this plan, the DHS seeks to unite with international corporate interests in an effort to ensure the dominance of the globalist ideal of centralized economy. The collectivist rhetoric inherent within the document above is apparent. Napolitano summarizes it well when she states:
“As globalization brings nations closer together, we need to jointly disprove and leave behind the notion that security and efficiency cannot coexist, and together build a security architecture that better uses information to assess risk. By taking a coordinated, strategic and thoughtful approach, we can expedite legitimate commerce while focusing our attention on that much smaller portion that poses harm. Security and confidence in the global supply chain enhance our collective economic strength, rather than impeding progress.”
Napolitano treats globalism as an inevitability; a future without recourse and without option. A smart person might ask; “What business is it of Janet Napolitano to comment on the global economic model, let alone utilize DHS resources in its defense!” But look at it this way; by using the failings of globalization and the spectral boogie-man of terrorism as a rationale, the DHS has created a grey area in which the U.S. government can be more fully integrated into the global corporate dynamic, which furthers the disintegration of American sovereignty.
The global supply chain encompasses everything! It is a vast artificial international construct. For the DHS to truly “defend” its integrity, it will be REQUIRED to sacrifice the specific and sovereign interests of the U.S. In a globalized trade system, every economy is important, as long as it does not compete with any other economy. The U.S. economy is no exception. Harmonization diminishes the wealth of more successful nations and transfers it to less successful nations. This transfer of wealth does, in a sense, create equality; it makes everyone equally poor. By becoming the militant hand of globalization, the DHS is put in the position of hurting America in order to “save” America.
The National Strategy For Global Supply Chain Security document is extraordinarily vague when it comes to the manner in which the DHS will implement defense directives. More DHS agents at shipping ports? Of course. More DHS involvement in airline cargo centers? Certainly. But what about DHS agents overseeing trucking and freight, or even stationed at highway checkpoints (remember, the TSA is an agency under the direct authority of the DHS)? What about DHS agents acting as permanent corporate liaisons? Will corporations decide who is a threat to the global supply chain and who isn’t? What about the usage of copyrighted materials on the internet? Is this a disruption of global trade? How does the DHS actually plan to return a disrupted supply line to normal efficiency? The DHS has no production capacity, and would have to TAKE (possibly by force) a supply from somewhere in order to reinstitute it elsewhere. What about communities, states, or countries which refuse to participate in globalization? What about those who choose to decentralize? Could this not be labeled as an attempt to derail the global system, and thus be interpreted as an act of terrorism?
Under any collectivist society, the act of non-participation is always painted as an attack on the group. In a fully interdependent system, refusing to contribute automatically hurts others, and therefore, makes you a criminal by default. These systems are built this way deliberately, in order to control a population by exploiting their sense of innate guilt. The DHS may claim a limited involvement in globalization, restricted to security issues, but the very process of integration with the international corporate framework as well as foreign institutions makes the agency a catalyst for forced collectivism. Bombs in shipping containers (the bombs we’re supposed to believe are everywhere), do not warrant the massive shift of our security apparatus into a policy of global centralization. In the end, this move on the part of the DHS has nothing to do with security, and everything to do with manipulating the attitude of the general public towards globalization. It is much more difficult to challenge a methodology when that methodology is suddenly treated as a national security issue, and is defended by an army of bureaucrats and blue-shirted thugs. When a world view is made violently essential to the very survival of a people, defiance is held tantamount to treason, and change, no matter how wise, becomes impossible.
You can contact Brandon Smith at: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.
To contribute to the growth of the Safe Haven Project, and to help us help others in relocating, or to support the creation of barter networks across the country, visit our donate page here:
http://www.alt-market.com/donate
Do you have enough Non-GMO seeds in case of economic collapse? Seeds are the OTHER alternative currency, and if you aren't stocked, then you aren't prepared. To buy top quality non-GMO seeds at a special 10% discount, visit Humble Seed, and use the code Alt10
written by B Chandler , February 07, 2012
I know it's hard to get the message out there. You're either preaching to the converted or shouting into a hurricane.
Anyhoo, I for one will keep coming back. It gives me ammunition for the "mark my words" speeches my extended family hate so much.
written by PioneerWife , February 07, 2012
Being that I work in the automotive industry, I find it interesting that Janet would reference the effect of the earthquake and tsunami on the automotive industry as justification for increased control of global supply chain security. Here is an article about one of our materials, Xirallic, that was severly affected due to the quake.
http://www.paintsquare.com/news/?fuseaction=view&id=5604
In this case, the companies involved realized their vulnerabilities and took measures to decrease it. Also, other companies have realized the opportunity and are developing their own lines of Xirallics, which will also minimize vulnerability. No where in this article did anyone say, "gee I wish the US Federal govt would have stepped in!". No company wants increased control over their affairs by govt agencies. All that does is add yet another layer of action that must happen before containment and response to the disaster can begin. Besides, what would DHS have done anyway, told the earth's crust not to quake? What a crock!
Brandon is spot on. This isn't about helping, this is about control, in the most dark and constricting way.
written by some guy , February 07, 2012
Someone should really punch that dude in the balls.
written by the minnesota connection , February 07, 2012
I really need to agree with Mr. Chandler's post. I am a die hard follower/reader of Mr. Smith's highly educational articles, but unfortunately I find it very difficult to persuade a whole lot of other people to follow along. I live in a very small rural community that is predominately Catholic and very set in their ways ( a bedroom community with an average age of about 55). Like you said Mr. Chandler, it's like "shouting into a hurricane". I just returned home from our local caucus that was held tonight and the two main topics that were discussed were abortion and same sex marriages. I tried to bring up the NDAA, Patriot Act, and Super PACS, and most looked at me like I was nuts. MOst had never heard of the NDAA and they certainly didn't have a clue what the Patriot act was.
It's a sad sad world we live in today.
written by Yoda , February 08, 2012
Kudos Mr. Smith: Outstanding journalism.
Chairman Obama is castrating the US military to pre W W I I levels.
I see a "tail wag the dog" war in the next 4 months.
Communist Revolution is Coming To a Neigborhood Near You.
http://www.magnifiedview.com/2011/10/18/occupying-wall-street-style-uprisings-and-the-arab-spring-revolutions/
Cordially, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it '> This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
P.S.: "May you live in interesting times" Ancient Chinese curse.
written by Oathkeeper_Scott , February 08, 2012
"Under any collectivist society, the act of non-participation is always painted as an attack on the group." And a core principle of libertarianism *is* non-participation: do whatever you do, just leave me out of it! Thus... The impending clash.
America dozes while her elites drive her headlong into the most foreseeable national catastrophe (insolvency)... and trap.
Our progressive elites have devised and carried out a master plan over the last 100+ years: undermining Constitutional protections, converting the gold standard dollar to fiat paper, establishing the parasitic Fed, strengthening federal control over our schools and elite control over the media while sapping our industrial and innovative capacities.
Brandon lays bare the 'National Police Force' that Candidate Obama said he wanted in 2007, neatly arranged by his 'frenemy' G.W. Bush & their same handlers.
Our govt schools have been mass-producing useful idiots and our elite-run media blows smoke and sunshine up all our nethers.
America has become a slave state asleep. Our belongings' value and wealth steadily sapped and stolen by the fiat dollar printing Fed, and our onerous tax system bleeds us into anemia... All the grand design of our elite 'betters' and reflecting the most pernicious qualities of humankind: there are always will be a percentage of people that are power-seeking slavers and woe be to the rest of us if they are allowed to lead.
As Thomas Jefferson said, 'bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution!'
written by Stevenson , February 09, 2012
Way to sum it up Scott, and thank you for being an Oathkeeper. My only question is that we see our freedoms being erroded at every turn, at every political speech and function, but most of us dont know, or are undecided about what to do. If these "thugs" in office truly are treasonous, thiefing, murdering bassturds, should we revolt? Should we individually succeed from scociety, should we ignore the "authoritys" when questioned, summoned, ordered... Please if people can post what small or large acts they "might" do in order to shift the "power", please many people such as myself are wondering what action can and possibly should be taken in order to reverse everything that has happened. In other words, if the blogging, posting, commenting ceased to exist tomorrow, what would you do?
Just to give a light example I'm looking into going off grid, nothing expensive, but comfortable. I believe that by partially seceding from a largely garbage society, I will help inspire others to do so as well. Rely mostly on whats directly around you, not on everything thats half a world away.
written by Kayser Sosa , February 11, 2012
With the recent rumblings of war in Iran, I have argued that, "Conventional warfare between nations is all but dead. It was killed by the integration of the global economy." My basis for this was that a destructive war with a major international oil supplier would interrupt the global supply chain, which, as Napolitano gets, could wreck economies around the world, including the US. To this end, I posited the likelihood of war would diminish.
But leave it to Big Sis to think she can control something as large, diverse, complex, and dynamic as the global supply chain. Where Brandon saw these efforts as a furtherance of our integration into globalization (to which they are), I also see them as an effort to command and control the supply chain such that we may wage war without the adverse risks of upsetting the chain. In either case, this is not about terrorism or natural disasters, this is about control.
written by Sandy , February 17, 2012
Notice that while Janet Napolitano is busily installing totalitarian police presence everywhere she can, Judge Napolitano has been preaching an essentially libertarian philosophy while exposing governmental excess and corruption. I doubt this is a coincidence. The NWO modus operandi is to always play both sides, to create maximum tension and fear and an illusion that we have choices.
Notice also that while Judge Napolitano's show has been taken off the air, Janet Napolitano's show budget has tripled.
Let's all pressure Obama to replace Janet with the Judge. That one step alone would set the march into totalitarianism back a few paces. That is, IF the Judge is what he seems to be. The symmetry and coincidence of names just reeks of standard NWO procedures.
written by Brandon Smith , February 19, 2012
@Sandy
Frankly, I see NO correlation between Janet Napolitano and Judge Napolitano except that they happen to have the same last name. Even though, admittedly, we do face massive subversion and conspiracy in this world, there is such a thing as being TOO paranoid, Sandy...
